this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2025

48 points (98.0% liked)

Asklemmy

asklemmy@lemmy.ml

56,090 readers

2,944 active

290 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~~Icon~~ by ~~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~~

founded 7 years ago

moderators

mekhos@lemmy.ml

14specks@lemmy.ml

What prevailing theory in scientific circles do you think is likely to be replaced with a new understanding by 2050? (lemmy.blahaj.zone)

submitted 1 year ago by tgirlschierke@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

43 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] 5in1k@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago*

I read somewhere that the bumps are way less than what is on a basketball were it scaled up. Each bump being taller than Everest.

parent