69
Do you think of making a SponsorBlock report as a doing a Civic Duty ? (lemmy.ml)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
39 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Here is my two cents on that question

When I fill out a sponsorblock,
I feel like I have comitted an act of civic duty
I feel pride

I hope others feel that too

I want to ***** on the grave of Ivy Lee and Edward Bernays and sponsorblock lets me symbolically do it.

We are participants in an hyperwar and I hope our side win.

Fellow sponsorblocker,
I don't know who you are,
I don't know where you are
But can I see you and I am proud of you
Fellow sponsorblocker, I salute you O7

To stop the nasty goblins and their stooges
who constantly besiege our minds and try to infect them
##Is our solemn duty
in this digital hyperwar
To protect the innocent from their vile endeavour
to have less and want more

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

I believe people should be paid for their time and effort. It's probably not sustainable to be regularly shooting and uploading videos on the side of a 9-5 job, and getting paid from videos allows people to focus on making them. Doesn't necessarily need to be ads or sponsors, but at the moment, it seems to be how it goes. At least sponsor segments aren't privacy invasive (unlike YouTube ads, probably).

If you're directly contributing to someone's money-making through different means, like Patreon or Nebula or whatever else, then I think SponsorBlock can be justified. In fact, it'd be interesting if SponsorBlock or something similar allowed people to directly contribute to creators in exchange for skipping sponsors.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [โ€“] [S] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    That's a money centric worldview.

    I don't think advertisers should be allowed to patron the arts, I think they have infected the art space and this is bad for all of us.
    I think people would do better, truer art (even if it were of lower objective quality) by not suffering the incentives and directives of advertising.
    I see advertising as a corrupting drug for art. While it creates more bulk I think it has made art worse as a whole.
    After the "adpocalypse" where were have destroyed every piece of advertising and cleansed it from the stench of marketing.
    This post-advertising world would have more art it in, it would mean more it would be better
    Nature abhors a vacuum, the death of advertising centric art would create a fertile space for art that is simply unthinkable at this moment.

    Get rid of your moneybrain

    Advertising and marketing will not gently let go, we have to exterminate it

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [โ€“] 1 point 1 year ago

    So people shouldn't be paid for their time and effort?

    Let us skip the part where y'all get paid and go directly into another month of work. Surely, when everyone stops getting paid, a new, unthinkable thing will come along.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent