@arimelody.me on Bluesky: "web developers are getting too cocky. if visiting your `.png` URI doesn't give me the raw bytes of a png image and nothing else, your balls should explode  if you don't have balls, you grow balls that immediately explode"
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 46 points 1 year ago (40 children)

I'm scared. What... What else could it do than serve a png image?

  • source
  • hideshow 40 child comments
  • [–] 142 points 1 year ago (19 children)

    I'm pretty sure that read it wraps the picture in some kind of picture viewer thing. I imagine it's an effort to keep you on the site or track your activity better.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 106 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    And their stupid website prevents you from zooming in on the image. Or they disabled right click on it in an attempt to stop you from saving the image. It really is pathetic

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Shift + right click will get your traditional right click options back

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Also F12 to open the developer panel, then check the "network" and "sources" tabs where you can see every single asset that is loaded (may need to refresh after opening the dev panel) and interact with them in a list

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Exactly, and pretty much everyone knows this. Which is why them putting effort into preventing it is stupid

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Didn't know that, but those download protection things also have other tricks like a transparent image placed over the top.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

    Instagram. It's impossible to save memes losslessly on mobile (least to my pathetic attempts). On desktop you can go into inspect element and yoink the png

    edit: my pathetic attempts are indeed pathetic. Thanks folks -u-

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I've never had an Instagram account because their Android app was so terrible that I was never able to sign up. I wasn't going to get an iPhone just so I could use a single app, and the whole reason I wanted Instagram was so was something to look at while on the bus or the train there's no point using the desktop version.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 57 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    This is what you get when you request a '.jpg' url from Reddit. It's a webpage and not just the image.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    best if You try to zoom-in on reddit pic, coz some uploaded fancy detailed map in 16k, and it is auto-shrinked to Your 2k monitor xD

    fcuk reddit, go old.reddit instead, style may be different, notifications may require new settings, but they open images as images, and this one deals with ads much better too, and have few other fancy stuff too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Except for image galleries; those are only available on new Reddit, and have all the same issues

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Do You mean when single post contains many pics? I can browse them all on old too, there are small text buttons for previous and next, above pic.

    Agree, You cannot make a post with more than single pic on old, text input field have only manual code input, instead panel with icons... It's like using linux instead mac ;d

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    There are a couple lines of ublock blocklist code you can add to fix this for reddit btw. Let me know if you want it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I would not mind it, please and thanks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Just slap these into the "My Filters" section and press apply :)

    reddit.com##zoomable-img:style(top: 0 !important; padding: 0 !important; height: unset !important;)
    reddit.com##post-bottom-bar
    reddit.com##:matches-path(/media) img:others()
    reddit.com##:matches-path(/media) :root:style(background-color: black !important;)
    

    Goes from this:

    To this:

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 1 year ago

    i’m sorry if your question was rhetorical (but in case anybody is curious) : some sites do some fancy routing and prevent you from loading the raw file, instead it loads an HTML page with all the desired ads, cookies, and other trackers for the site in question. This method also often circumvents your ability to “open the image in a new tab”, or “download the linked file” directly. I’ve seen this most often on sites that serve GIFs (so if your messaging app’s gif search functionality fails you, and you go looking online for something better you, you’re “forced” to share a link to a site that your friend has to visit instead of the gif you were intending to share)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I’ve gotten back .webp and .gif images with .png extensions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Thats nothing new. Also common to get files with no extension, so you have to play the guessing game to get windows to open it properly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Literally anything.

    Files extensions are an old DOS thing that's still in Windows. Unix-derived stuff never really cared, at least not in the same way.

    What actually matters is the MIME type set in the HTTP headers, which is "image/png" for png. Traditionally, the file extension is mapped to a MIME type, because that makes things easy for everyone, but nothing says it has to be that way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    The HTTP headers can be wrong, the only definitive way to determine a file's content type is to read it. This is why you can stick an image that has a mime type header of application/octet-stream in an img tag and it'll mostly work. Most binary formats will have some kind of magic number at the start to help determine it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Which is bad and wrong. Postel's law has been considered a bad idea by Postel himself for a while. We shouldn't let such fuzziness go through.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Meh, you shouldn't need a sophisticated understanding of file formats and web server configuration to make a website, so some slack is imo a good thing. Maybe not as much as there is, but reading the head of an image file doesn't seem that big a deal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment