▲ 151 ▼ Amy Klobuchar learned that a video clip of her was going viral on social media. So she clicked on it. She saw her face and her voice saying vulgar things she had never said. It was an AI deepfake. (www.nytimes.com) submitted 1 year ago by Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] artyom@piefed.social 3 points 1 year ago (6 children) To my knowledge, that only covers pornographic content. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (4 children) And the Patriot Act was only implemented to catch terrorists. What's considered "pornographic content" is entirely subjective and up to the personal feelings of a particular judge. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] allo@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago as a victorian from over a century ago, i find anything depicting unclothed ankles to be porn. permalink fedilink source parent [–] artyom@piefed.social -1 points 1 year ago (2 children) There's no judge in the world who could make the leap that this is pornographic. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago Looks at judges who have decided any sign of support for Palestine is terrorism permalink fedilink source parent [–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* Ah, but with the definition having multiple meanings then can easily make that call. the depiction of acts in a sensational manner so as to arouse a quick intense emotional reaction So all those things posted online like “food porn,” “travel porn,” etc can be classified as pornography because now we have a definition that isn’t necessarily sexual. It’s bullshit, but they can still make it the definition used to make their case about why it’s “bad.” GOP is good at using broad strokes to paint their evil. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Maestro@fedia.io 1 point 1 year ago ...for now... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (4 children) And the Patriot Act was only implemented to catch terrorists. What's considered "pornographic content" is entirely subjective and up to the personal feelings of a particular judge. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] allo@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago as a victorian from over a century ago, i find anything depicting unclothed ankles to be porn. permalink fedilink source parent [–] artyom@piefed.social -1 points 1 year ago (2 children) There's no judge in the world who could make the leap that this is pornographic. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago Looks at judges who have decided any sign of support for Palestine is terrorism permalink fedilink source parent [–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* Ah, but with the definition having multiple meanings then can easily make that call. the depiction of acts in a sensational manner so as to arouse a quick intense emotional reaction So all those things posted online like “food porn,” “travel porn,” etc can be classified as pornography because now we have a definition that isn’t necessarily sexual. It’s bullshit, but they can still make it the definition used to make their case about why it’s “bad.” GOP is good at using broad strokes to paint their evil. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] allo@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago as a victorian from over a century ago, i find anything depicting unclothed ankles to be porn. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] artyom@piefed.social -1 points 1 year ago (2 children) There's no judge in the world who could make the leap that this is pornographic. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago Looks at judges who have decided any sign of support for Palestine is terrorism permalink fedilink source parent [–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* Ah, but with the definition having multiple meanings then can easily make that call. the depiction of acts in a sensational manner so as to arouse a quick intense emotional reaction So all those things posted online like “food porn,” “travel porn,” etc can be classified as pornography because now we have a definition that isn’t necessarily sexual. It’s bullshit, but they can still make it the definition used to make their case about why it’s “bad.” GOP is good at using broad strokes to paint their evil. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago Looks at judges who have decided any sign of support for Palestine is terrorism permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* Ah, but with the definition having multiple meanings then can easily make that call. the depiction of acts in a sensational manner so as to arouse a quick intense emotional reaction So all those things posted online like “food porn,” “travel porn,” etc can be classified as pornography because now we have a definition that isn’t necessarily sexual. It’s bullshit, but they can still make it the definition used to make their case about why it’s “bad.” GOP is good at using broad strokes to paint their evil. permalink fedilink source parent