Are there any comparison shots between 5.0 and 5.01?
comments
Wise Investment
I didn't really care for Cyberpunk at first. I stopped playing before the end of the opening chapter. After the DLC was released I gave it another shot and ended up loving it and spent hundreds of hours over multiple playthroughs. It could of been much better, but it was a good game and definitely brought back the spirit of GTA 4-5 for me.
Yeah and V is easier to project yourself on due to the rest of the customizability, whereas Geralt you're getting projected I guess?
They are pretty much the same in regards to the RPGness... The major differences are the setting and the combat.
Cyberpunk might be a little more in depth because V can have 3 different backstories, that add incredibly small changes to some dialogues where as The Witcher you're always the same Geralt.
Was about to whinge because I was hoping for more CP2077 till I noticed the sub was witcher. Lol so yay!!! Congrats for more W3 content!
A bit far fetched but hey ...

But the most interesting reactions, I think, are coming from The Witcher side of the CD Projekt street, where some more conspiratorial thinkers (or maybe it's just me and Mark at RPS?) see it as potentially classic dad-style wordplay: There are no plans for Cyberpunk 2077 DLC, but we never said anything about Witcher 3!
I'm so here for this. 🤌🏼
Is this the CDPR project releasing this year that people were interpreting as another possible Witcher III DLC?
Witcher 1 remake pls
Sorry, i think i express myself wrong, is not like i don't care about story, but before i was "story>gameplay" now is the opposite, i like story, but today i priorize gameplay over
No offense but you shouldn't be playing a Witcher game for the gameplay, but for the story 😅
Not that TW3 gameplay is bad, but what makes it worth playing it 120 hours is the story, not the combat
You have to understand, i was the story first when i was young (and umployed), i played a lot of JRPGs with terrible combat and enemy encounter rate.
Those days, i rather have a game with a shallow story but a awesome fun gameplay, i definitively not in Soulslike anymore, and stop playing all my games on hard or expert.
If the game is make me do a lot of extra effort to play it, it simply doesn't woth my time
It aged poorly, but it's definitely not "awful". I played it in 2009 and it was then my 2nd favorite RPG after Mass Effect
The attacks didn't even connect physically, and enemies barelly have feedback on damage they take.
Playing Old School CRPG with top view camera stil it doesn't help either, it tried be two different styles of RPG and end up being bad in both
it didnt age well lol
takes a lot to get into the weird fight mechanic. you need to fully embrace that odd fighting system, then it works i guess
Holy shit, i couldn't wish for more, i really tried play TW1, but that game is awful
The report follows similar claims from a Polish games insider, Borys Nieśpielak, who said last year that the new content was secretly in development at Fool’s Theory, the same studio currently remaking The Witcher 1 for CD Projekt.
So is the remake of TW1 the DLC for TW3 ?
Patch it so I can make Geralt the slut he was always meant to be and not have to choose.
3 out 5 times I chose Yennefer, but I'm glad the game let me choose Triss and Shani cause I romanced both in TW1
Strange, that the wheel of time series started pretty bad. It actually got quite good by the third season. Just in time for cancellation
It's not just TV series in my mind. I've seen dozens of movies that start with a great premise, rockin' right along and then run out of steam near the end. Comedies are the worst. Best jokes and plot up front, then filler for the rest.
Those movies don't have enough content for a feature length show and TV shows often don't have enough content to go beyond a season.
The sequence about this in Invincible is amazing

