[–] 2 points 4 days ago

Cowboy is trying to make their entire upper stage a data center, so they're more reliant on having their own rocket.

AST... I don't really get why they wouldn't just work with Firefly to make a custom fairing or something. The launch crunch is still real now, and it'll take years to replace the Falcon cadence, but I don't see any way for them to be faster.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 4 days ago

    These two have a different business case than launch startups. Cowboy and AST are both focused on their satellites (data centers and direct to cell comms, respectively) and a way to launch them.

    SpaceX is pulling back from the commercial market, and a big part of Starlink success is the low internal Falcon 9 pricing vs what Amazon and Oneweb pay commercially. Vertically integrating launch can be a huge leg up IF (giant if) they actually pull it off.

    Blue Origin has announced their own comms and data center constellations. I wouldn't be surprised if Relativity did the same.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    You and I see the same things.

    Makes me wonder what we're missing. SpaceX seems to have beat everyone "to the punch", yet all these other companies keep going (and I wish them well, monopolies are problematic).

    Is there that much more opportunity that we don't see?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago

    Tbh, I prefer the acronyms. I would much rather have acronyms than have to remember or say the full name of something like that. Sometimes they are overused but I think if you want clarity acronyms are a useful tool.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    "You're on a scenic route through a state recreational area known as the human mind. You ask a passer-by for directions, only to find he has no face or something. Suddenly up ahead, a door in the road. You swerve, narrowly avoiding: The Scary Door."

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: next ›