Can anyone give me a single example of something that works well that was created via "vibe coding" from someone who doesn't know how to code otherwise?

I'll wait.

At this rate, we will have Perfect Burgers in another six months to two years

For some reason the burger has four buns. The pickles are on top of the outer bun. There is a second plate inside the burger.

"Me want burger" directed at the microwave while it spins your frozen mid-tier burger.

It spits out a weirdly hot but cold "burger" after a minute. The bread is mush and the patty is frozen in the center, but it's a burger none the less.

"Wow and just think, in a decade everyone could be a 5star chef like me"

I like my microwave as much as the next person, and it has its usecase like any tool, but lets not start building microwaves into cars and fridges and washing machines.

And nothing about describing something in natural language to the slop machine involves "writing code."

isn't it strange that he just drops the "read code" part right as he pivots into his pro-AI drivel?

You're laughing. He's claudemaxxing and you're laughing.

What the fuck.

Jesus Christ this man needs his head checked.

Of course. I meant it's not clear what point they were trying to make about that.

But a goat is the greatest by definition.
There can't exist a "my goat is goater than your goat" situation, logically.

I assume it's a reference to the recent repl.it happenings

Are they trying to say that it is dangerous to develop on production (true) or that it is stupid to use AI (doubtful)? This seems like a somewhat confused analogy.

Yeah you have to approach SQL in prod sheepishly and maybe wrap in a BEGIN TRAN ROLLBACK TRAN.

Next month's goat will fix all the problems!

That's just baaaaa-d practice

Sure, long as you use your braing.

I start a lot of stuff I never finish, does that make me a startup expert?

He should have used AI to help with his post then

Using AI on libraries you know inside and out (you know all the attributes of the classes you're working with and you know what the arguments are for every function) feels great. Using AI on libraries you're not familiar with will simply cause you to lose time because AI will give you code that returns different object types than the library is expecting. Then, instead of understanding why you're asking it to fix it, it will try variations of similar code and make up an excuse as to why now it's fixed, despite it having no clue what the problem was. Even if the code "runs" you'll have to refactor it anyways because code is not one size fits all.

It can be useful to sparking creativity but if you're not reading documentation you're just looking busy while not accomplishing much

"startup expert". I rest my case.

Dude, writing code is the fun part, reviewing code written by others is time-consuming, difficult and boring. Why would you automate the fun out of coding and force yourself to review even more shit?

Has lots of experience starting things, yet doesn't look old. Hmmm.

....and you're getting a blowjob at the same time. But LLMs don't do that (yet!)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKcLemQtREY

Eh, English probably isn't his native language. I try to be pretty forgiving spelling and grammar on the Internet.