[–] 1 point 1 week ago (1 child)

@BastilleBSD metacpan.org/pod/DateTime::Eve (or similar) and then use that to generate oneshot cronjobs drop-in files w/a prefix of your choosing (for easy cleanup) in /etc/cron.d/, that fire off a command at the precise time per day based on timestamps from this? Cron runs every minute IIRC.Each week, clean up the old oneshot job file and generate next week's job file.Make sure to schedule the cleanup + regeneration task after the last sunset, but also before any summer/normal time changes.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago

    @harrysintonen funny, to me it translates to "here is another way to deal with error handling"it's close to your translation, there is less negativity thoughespecially useful with recursive functions/data structures

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    @vwbusguy @vwbusguy some of these are far more universally useful than others.... do you really think every programmer needs to learn ansible, even if they (for a totally hypothetical example) have zero interest in cloud computing and much greater interest in embedded software and cryptography? (Not to mention, a limited budget.)

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    @remixtures Thanks for sharing, I found the article very clear and well explained. One important thing: the Critic is only as good as the Spec. If the spec is ambiguous, or “done” is vague or not written down at all, it has nothing to reject against. Writing a good, clear spec matters now more than ever.

  • source
  • [–] [S] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    @zerowan Yes, I use Claude Opus 5.5 via Claude Code to check the source code of the repositories and then write the documentation. But then I use GPT 6.1 Sol to review the text produced by Opus. This is great because you can never guess which model makes the best findings. In any case, lately Claude seems to accept the majority of the suggestions and recommendations provided by GPT. I don't even know how can someone say that the outcome of such an itirerative process is just slop. Yes, it takes a lot of time and persistence. Yet, for the great majority of scenarios, the quality of the final output is always better than it would be without using AI agents/LLMs. This will, of course, not work as expected if there's no human being in the loop to make use of his judgement and critical thinking skills when agents seem to lack the proper context.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    @remixtures i don’t call it that but work that way anyway - i design and discuss with chatbot higher model - abd implement with builder in terminal - but have each one teview the other - but the builder gets most decisions on implementation as it sees the code base directly _

  • source
  • view more: next ›