[–] [S] 1 point 24 minutes ago

We really fell in love with Romania, it's such a beautiful country. Not over touristic yet, lots of nature, really beautiful old towns, very nice people and a very welcoming atmosphere. And proud Europeans! I've never seen a country before that hangs an EU flag next to every single national flag, down to lamp posts in the smallest village.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 2 hours ago* (1 child)

    Lol, for the first glance it looked like the square was flooded to me! It makes more sense now. To be fair, it's picturesque either way.

    Note to self: visit the country before I kick the bucket. It's just gorgeous all around.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

    Thanks! I did some minimal digital editing afterwards, but I try not to "cheat" too much when shooting on film.

    I have them developed at CameraNu.
    They have a service for developing and scanning photos on film, and the actual machine to develop colour film happens to be located at the Eindhoven branch.

    So I can bring in a roll and the scans get sent to my email within two hours.

    Edit: I'll upload the original scan when I get home, so you can be the judge as to whether I cheated πŸ˜„

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 5 hours ago (1 child)

    Fair enough - though with those goals I would see what smart phones with decent cameras in your price range can do, as an alternative approach. To me, fun includes "always with you" - I may have a very nice "proper" camera, but it's not something I can stick in my pocket :)

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 4 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

    Interesting and quite effective choice to have such dark sides to the photo and a central golden strip. I like the way you can see the detail in the sides if you pay attention. I'm guessing the sky was over-exposed in this photo - did you try extracting a bit more detail from it (e.g. a hint of cloud shapes) as, to me, as the lack of detail feels a bit out of keeping with the rest.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 7 hours ago (3 children)

    Depending on how you develop (hah), you may come to find "Proper color straight out of the camera" a bit of an irrelevance. By its very nature, a camera can only make simple guesses about a good colour balance and luminance curve looks like for any given shot. If its guesses happen to be ones that satisfy you for the sort of shots you take, great, but you may well move on to taking RAW format photos and messing about in post-processing to get results that satisfy you more, especially if you take a wide range of types of shots. And your range from cats to landscapes to events is wide!

    So do look at the post-processing options and software available for that camera (alas, I can comment nothing on the camera model). It also means that quality of lens, sensor and auto-focus should also be a concern of course - if the basics aren't right, no post processing can rescue the result (bar outrageous levels of AI work).

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 11 hours ago

    Beautiful picture! My grandma was from IaΘ™i and told me that in Sibiu they make sausage out of horse meat. Not once or twice, that was part of the lore growing up and the only thing I knew about Sibiu. I looked it up now and turns out it's bologna (pardon the pun)? Maybe was true a century ago?

  • source
  • view more: next β€Ί