“This is about more than one health service,” officials wrote. “It is about Indigenous sovereignty. It is about our responsibility to care for one another.”

Compared with bacterial food spoilers such as Salmonella, Escherichia coli, or Campylobacter, which each cause many more cases annually, Cyclospora, a protozoan parasite, hasn’t been “on the radar” as much, says Kellogg Schwab, a public health scientist at Johns Hopkins University. PulseNet, a national network that uses DNA data from pathogens to connect cases across states, only tracks bacteria-related foodborne illnesses.

And unlike bacteria, Cyclospora only reproduces in humans’ small intestine; it can’t be grown in the lab. That gives researchers considerably less material to analyze. “All we can work with is the parasites that are in the person’s stool,” says Joel Barratt, an associate professor at Emory University’s School of Medicine who led the Cyclospora laboratory team of CDC’s Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria until his resignation last year. What’s more, whole-genome sequencing, which makes it easy to compare organisms, would be too expensive for Cyclospora because its genome is “massive,” Barratt says: some 44 million base pairs, about 10 times larger than those of Salmonella or E. coli. Instead, CDC relies on tests that target eight specific genetic markers.

And finally, bacteria reproduce asexually in the human gut, creating nearly perfect clones that make it easy to identify genetic clusters. Cyclospora reproduces sexually, a process in which two parasites scramble their genes. That means even samples from the same source “are not going to be genetically identical,” Barratt says.

A US study has found a 70% drop in hospital admissions and days off from work or school when people with poorly controlled asthma had their gas stove and hob replaced with electric.

Ohio’s publicly owned MetroHealth began the study in December 2024 but funding was terminated early by the incoming Trump administration. It had been designed to investigate if replacing gas cooking improved asthma for 1,200 people living near Cleveland, Ohio.

Prof Ash Sehgal of Case Western Reserve University, the project’s leader, said: “We had completed the project at fewer than 100 households. As a result, over 1,100 households were unable to benefit. We also had to lay off about 20 project staff.”

The team finished the stove replacements that were under way and closed the project, but to the researchers’ surprise, the benefits could be clearly detected even in the scaled-down study of 72 homes.

Sehgal said: “We were surprised when we analysed the results and found a very large effect size. The improvements in asthma symptoms following stove change were similar to – or even greater than – those reported in clinical trials of commonly used asthma medications.”

Air pollution was measured in 44 of the homes. On average, nitrogen dioxide dropped 70%.

Sehgal A, Schuellerman P, Dolata J, et al. Asthma Control Before and After Changing Gas Stoves to Electric Stoves. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, 2026. link

At a recent appointment, Emily’s physical therapist (who knows some about her research) said, “Before we get started, there’s something I want to ask you about.” The something was an automatic “scribing” system their office is trialling for two weeks and deciding whether to purchase. These systems take in a (presumably audio-only) recording of the patient encounter and then output a draft patient note for the chart.

So what’s the big deal with “AI” charting? Here are nine reasons why we recommend refusing to consent to the use of scribing tools in healthcare settings:

The Canadian Cancer Society urges provinces and territories to provide fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) to everyone 45 to 74 years of age.

From The Globe and Mail via this RSS feed

Public spending on prescription medications in Canada grew by more than 9 per cent in 2024, with one drug driving the increase more than any other: Ozempic.

From The Globe and Mail via this RSS feed

Since Donald Trump’s election in 2016, popular entertainment has struggled with how to reflect the resulting upheaval in American politics and culture. Many Hollywood projects have taken a heavy-handed approach: Think of how often you’ve been told that a certain movie or TV show is “exactly what we need right now.” During Trump’s first term, these direct, if unsubtle, approaches felt like honest reactions to the moment. Now nearly 10 years later—and one year into Trump’s second term—audiences are savvier and more suspicious about such transparent messaging.

Perhaps sensing this wariness, the creators of some of the more politically compelling movies and TV shows of the past year have instead explored how being alive feels during a tumultuous period. They capture the atmosphere, the mood, the ambient existence of everyday people who are living through a transformative time in history, whether or not they recognize that they are doing so.

Consider James Blaine “J.B.” Mooney, the museum-robbing protagonist of Kelly Reichardt’s The Mastermind, which is set in suburban Massachusetts in 1970. Played as both a careful schemer and a lazy layabout by Josh O’Connor, J.B. is not pushed into a life of crime—he chooses it because he’s just that bored. This wayward boredom is more striking when you consider what he ignores: Whenever the news is on, J.B. listens nonchalantly, apathetic about the war in Vietnam. He behaves as though current events are so far beyond his control or influence that participating at all is utterly pointless. He may as well try robbing an art museum if nothing matters.

Toward the end of the movie, he joins an anti-war protest—but only accidentally, as he’s attempting to blend into the public after stealing an older woman’s purse. But the police can’t tell the difference, and when the protest is broken up, J.B. is thrown into the back of a paddy wagon all the same. His experience may be identifiable to many in the audience: the feeling that you are separate from the news, until it slaps you in the face. We are left to wonder whether he will finally be able to appreciate the world around him now that he has been implicated in it.

One Battle After Another is another example of a film that adroitly channels modern anxieties. Set in a vaguely familiar United States, the story focuses on a man named Bob Ferguson (played by Leonardo DiCaprio), a former member of a far-left revolutionary group called the French 75. When an enemy from his past reemerges to kidnap his daughter, Bob must tap back into his old network and relocate her to safety. The movie is purposefully ambiguous about details within its version of American reality: Although white supremacists scheme in hidden conference rooms about controlling the nation’s population, we never learn anything about the government in power.

Many of the film’s standout sequences, though, engage with this alternate world from the ground up. Benicio del Toro earned an Oscar nomination for his role as Sergio St. Carlos, a local activist who is deeply involved with his undocumented-immigrant neighbors as ICE-like agents search for them in the streets of Baktan Cross, a city that strongly resembles Los Angeles. Sergio is One Battle’s beating heart and its hero, someone who is focused on helping out where he can. The film is not concentrated on who or what is responsible for society’s militarized turn, but audiences get an intimate feel for how people like Sergio have decided to respond.

[Read: The misunderstanding of Perfidia]

These recognizable universes, in which characters attempt to make meaning for themselves amid jarring headlines, can be seen across contemporary media. Eddington takes place in a small southwestern town during the early pandemic: Sheriff Joe Cross (Joaquin Phoenix) butts heads with Mayor Ted Garcia (Pedro Pascal) over mask mandates and the encroachment of data centers, while the town itself is met with Black Lives Matter protests, supposed antifa agitators, child-trafficking pedo cults, and clout-chasing influencers. Rather than stake out any specific stances, Eddington convincingly depicts the confounding environment that its characters—and many of its audience members—are forced to interpret.

Tim Robinson’s The Chair Company is likewise uncomfortably adept at depicting how navigating our immensely complicated, interconnected society can feel. Robinson plays an average man who, upon probing the origins of a poorly made chair that collapses under him at his job, is swept into a convoluted conspiracy that grants him a monomaniacal sense of destiny. Like The Mastermind, the show may not outwardly seem like a response to the current moment, but it taps into a desire—a compulsion, even—to understand how the world really works amid the conflicting, overwhelming phenomena shredding any shared sense of normalcy. Robinson’s protagonist has no idea what’s going on, but he’s desperate to find out.

Of course, Hollywood hasn’t entirely abandoned more obvious takes on the Trump era—and in particular, its starring character: Bong Joon Ho’s first film since he won a Best Picture Oscar for Parasite is Mickey 17, a wacky sci-fi tale about clones facing off against a braying tyrant who seems very clearly a figure modeled in part on Trump (although the director has claimed otherwise). Mark Hamill shows up in The Long Walk as a cartoonishly fascist major barking about boosting the economy through grotesque violence, a character easily perceived to be a caricature of Trump. Tune in to Saturday Night Live, and almost every week you’ll get James Austin Johnson’s dutiful imitation of the president. But after a certain point, you get the idea. None of these examples seem particularly invested in what the audience, whatever its political persuasion, is actually feeling or experiencing in Trump’s America.

More intriguing are the honest and intentional stories about how regular people move through landscapes defined by entropy and division but also community. Such works treat their characters as political beings with complex lives worth interrogating. They leave behind obvious targets, let new figures emerge, and keep moving forward.

*Illustration sources: Warner Bros; A24 Press; MUBI / Everett Collection; Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc.

From The Atlantic via this RSS feed

From The Globe and Mail via this RSS feed

From The Globe and Mail via this RSS feed

From The Globe and Mail via this RSS feed

The Edmonton Oilers are building their sense of belief.

From this RSS feed

Alternative link: https://archive.is/20260120143249/https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-volunteer-program-immigrant-doctors-medical-english-help-cma/

Romel Castillo, a family physician originally from Cuba, learned much more than words when he joined a fledgling program to brush up on his medical English.

He learned the unspoken language of practising medicine in Canada, where concepts such as patient privacy, cultural competency and shared decision-making can be different than in an immigrant doctor’s homeland.

On Tuesday, HELP will get a major boost when the Canadian Medical Association Foundation announces a $645,000 grant to expand the program so that volunteer Canadian doctors can share their expertise with at least 330 more immigrants like Dr. Castillo, who is working in the health system, but not yet as a doctor.

Health Canada is planning to speed up reviews of some medications by piggybacking on the decisions of foreign regulators, including possibly the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which has been in turmoil since Donald Trump returned to the White House a year ago.

Ottawa has not yet revealed which foreign drug authorities or which classes of drugs will be subject to the change, outlined in a draft ministerial order designed to quicken the pace of pharmaceutical approvals in Canada.

From The Globe and Mail via this RSS feed

(November 14, 2025)

By: Freq 90.5/Oldies 96.7 News staff

The Ontario Health Coalition is warning about the long-term consequences of health-care privatization, pointing to new research from overseas that it says mirrors decisions being made in Ontario today.

In reports released by Professor Allyson M. Pollock and Graham Kirkwood of Newcastle University, the research outlines how two decades of privatization in England — including shifting funding from the National Health Service (NHS) to private providers for surgeries such as knee, hip and cataract procedures — has led to reduced public capacity, longer wait times, and widening health inequalities. The findings note poorer and less healthy patients are waiting longer for care as a two-tier system emerges.

By contrast, Scotland expanded its NHS capacity without relying on private clinics and has not seen inequalities grow to the same extent.

Ontario Health Coalition executive director Natalie Mehra says those trends offer a cautionary example, adding Ontario is “about a decade behind” England but began down a similar path.

Pollock’s research also shows wealthier, healthier patients in England not only wait less for NHS-funded care but are more likely to be readmitted to public hospitals — displacing lower-income patients from the queue. Mehra says early signs of similar inequities are already appearing in Ontario. While private-sector patients in England experience shorter waits individually, the introduction of private providers has been linked to longer overall wait times for poorer and less healthy patients.

Mehra says Ontario private clinics can charge a 20 per cent premium for procedures such as cataract surgery — the same surgery that public hospitals can perform. She argues investments should prioritize the public system to move patients through care faster.

Link to original article: https://www.ptbotoday.ca/2025/11/14/95409/

(November 17, 2025)

By: BarrieToday Staff

Labour and health officials were in Barrie today to shed light on academic reports around privatization of hospital surgeries in England.

They say this led to growing inequality, longer wait times and disruption of services in the public health-care system.

Allyson Pollock, co-author of the reports and professor emerita at Newcastle University, has been investigating cataract, knee and hip surgeries in England and Scotland over a 20-year period.

She says the current system in England benefits wealthier patients who can "jump the queue" by accessing care at private, for-profit facilities, while the poorest and less healthy people suffer longer wait times for hip and knee surgery due to reduced capacity in public hospitals.

The Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) says the reports contrast extensive privatization with Scotland, which continued to invest in public health care and was able to increase surgical rates without using the private sector.

The Ontario Health Coalition and CUPE’s Ontario Council of Hospitals Unions (OCHU-CUPE) say this research offers "important lessons" for Ontario, where the provincial government has been expanding privatization of cataract, hips and knee surgeries through private clinics.

By 2024, the reports say 59 per cent of cataract surgeries were being delivered privately in England, up from 15 per cent in 2019. The report also says this expansion came at a "steep cost" to the public purse as expenditures have increased. Between 2018-19 and 2022-23, the number of cataract surgeries across England increased by 25 per cent while annual expenditure went up by 95 per cent.

“The private sector takes away precious resources from the public system,” Pollock said in a release. “In addition to the significant amount of money diverted to private owners, public hospitals lose doctors and other staff who are required to manage and monitor more complicated eye care.”

It’s estimated that 60,000 patients have been displaced from surgical wait lists to make way for patients who had their original treatment in private facilities, the reports indicate.

“The private sector cherry-picks healthier patients, discharges them early and then washes its hands of patients, so that the management of re-admissions including complications following surgery goes back to the public system,” Pollock said. “Meanwhile, the poorer and sicker patients suffer longer wait times in England.

"In Scotland, where privatization is minimal, access to care is based on need instead of affluence," she added.

While wait times have been shorter for patients going to the private sector, for every one per cent of patient growth in publicly funded private sector treatments, the overall wait times for all patients rise by two per cent in England, the reports say.

"Ontario must learn from the perilous path of privatization followed in England and abandon its privatization of surgical care," OCHU-CUPE says in the release.

Between 2017 and 2022, they say about 19 per cent of cataract surgeries in Ontario were delivered by private clinics. The provincial government is also providing $125 million over two years to private clinics for 20,000 hip and knee surgeries, while another $155 million is being moved to the private sector for diagnostic tests.

“Like in England, Ontario is paying a higher price for cataract surgeries in private clinics. Like England, we are seeing increasing inequities in access to care," said Natalie Mehra, OHC's executive director.

OHC says it has been investigating private clinics across the province for "unethical practices," as the organization has received complaints from patients about upselling and extra-billing. It claims some private clinics in the Barrie area, when contacted by OHC, provided misleading and unethical information.

"For instance, one private clinic said that patients could get faster access to cataract surgeries by paying out-of-pocket," states the release. "They suggested this would help avoid the 'OHIP route,' which would entail wait times of six months or more."

Mehra says wait times at Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre in Barrie are about 4.5 months (139 days) for the lowest priority patients.

“We are calling on the Ford government to stop the private clinics and put that funding into the public hospitals that behave ethically and provide high-quality cataract surgery in accordance with the patient protections in our public medicare laws,” she added.

Link to original article: https://www.barrietoday.com/local-news/ontario-warned-against-following-englands-path-on-surgical-privatization-11501095

"In fact, 41 percent of working-age Americans—or 72 million people—have medical bill problems or are paying off medical debt, up from 34 percent in 2005. If you add in the 7 million elderly adults who are also dealing with these issues, a total of 79 million Americans have medical bill or debt problems."

Population of Canada in 2025 ~ 40.2 - 41.7 million.

Links: https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/newsletter-article/survey-79-million-americans-have-problems-medical-bills-or-debt

Updated Nov 20, 2025 7:44 am.

"Among the findings was a lack of due diligence in the transfer of services, poor risk assessment by AHS, and the decision to proceed despite knowing the main objective of saving money was unlikely to be achieved.

The report points to then-health minister Adriana LaGrange as having pressed for the move, with her department accused of undermining AHS in the process.

In the spring of 2022, the Alberta government signed a 15-year contract with DynaLife to fully privatize lab testing services in the province. Less than a year after the transition, the province bought out DynaLife in a multi-million dollar deal that returned the lab contract to Alberta Precision Labs (APL), which is part of AHS."

https://calgary.citynews.ca/2025/11/19/alberta-dynalife-report/

(November 14, 2025)

By: Global News

The Ontario Health Coalition and CUPE are concerned about the potential consequences or privatizing surgeries in Ontario. According to research from Allyson Pollock, a professor at Newcastle University, an increase in contracting out cataract, hip and knee surgeries to for-profit facilities in England led to increased inequalities, reduced capacity and longer wait times at public hospitals. Those findings were presented during a press conference at the Peterborough Public Library on Thursday morning. CUPE and the Ontario Health Coalition say the province can learn from this research and apply the lessons to its own healthcare system.

Link to video coverage: https://globalnews.ca/video/11526752/ontario-health-coalition-cupe-warn-ontario-of-consequences-of-privatizing-surgeries

The OHC notes that as funding is diverted from Ontario’s public hospitals to private clinics (predominantly for-profit), the most affluent people benefit at the expense of the majority of people.

According to Hurley, there’s also an evident divide in access to care since virtually all private clinics in Ontario are located in the wealthiest neighbourhoods of large urban centres where there is a sizable market of wealthier people who can afford to pay extra user fees.

That means rural areas and small towns like Midland don’t typically have private clinics, he notes.

Hurley also points to a study published last year by the Canadian Medical Association, which determined that privatization of cataract surgeries in Ontario correlated with increasing inequity in access to care.

According to the CMA report, the most affluent people increased access to care by 22 per cent while the most marginalized suffered a nine per cent decrease in surgical rates.

Hurley says that it’s essential for Ontario “to course-correct as soon as possible before the system is deeply fractured like in England” where restoring capacity and reducing inequalities would be expensive due to the extent of privatization.

Link to original article: https://www.villagereport.ca/village-picks/crisis-coming-prof-hopes-province-learns-from-englands-privatization-miscues-11544680

(November 27, 2025)

By: Iris Gorfinkel, Toronto Star

Ontarians need to be on high alert. Alberta has taken a major step toward privatizing health care. Bill 55 will allow surgeons to work in both public hospitals and private‑pay clinics. Under this dual-practice model, cataract surgeries and joint replacements done during business hours would be covered by the province, while the same procedures in evenings or on weekends could be sold to patients for out-of-pocket fees.

Alberta would also let investor‑run corporations operate public hospitals — turning them into profit centres and throwing the doors open to a two‑tier system. It’s framed as “choice, efficiency and innovation,” but it effectively turns patient wait-lists into a customer list, targeting those who can pay with shorter waits.

This sets a concerning precedent. Ontario doesn’t have a Bill 55 by name, but a version of this is already taking shape through expanding for‑profit clinics and extra fees. We’re promised “you’ll show your OHIP card, not your credit card” — there’s nothing to fear. But Ontario’s reality shows how quickly a publicly funded procedure can turn into a profit-generating business once regulation allows it.

Privately run centres in Ontario perform cataract operations, orthopedic surgeries and imaging, such as MRIs and CT scans. These are funded through the provincial plan, but independent investigations have documented patients being charged thousands of dollars in extra fees for services that should have been covered.

The Ontario Health Coalition’s report, “Under the Skin” details clinics billing seniors for premium lenses, administrative fees and mandatory “consultation packages.” Many vulnerable patients didn’t realize those fees were illegal or that the basic surgery was already covered by OHIP under both the Canada Health Act and Ontario law.

Proponents argue that for‑profit centres are harmless because core services on offer remain publicly funded. But the dividing line between “public” and “private” quickly blurs when providers make more income from those who pay. In practice, this means promoting upgrades, upselling services and steering patients toward paid options, whether or not they’re medically needed.

Ontarians who can afford it buy their way to faster care, while patients living paycheque to paycheque are left with even longer wait times as the public system is drained of staff by higher-paid private work. This is gradually shifting Ontario away from universal, equitable care toward a system where health justice hinges on income.

International experience with privatization sends a stark warning. A recent comparison of 25 wealthy countries by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives found that countries that rely more heavily on private health care tend to suffer more preventable illnesses and die sooner. Maternal and infant mortality rates also rise when countries are more reliant on for-profit health systems.

In contrast, countries with strong public systems — like Sweden, Norway and Denmark — live longer, have fewer preventable diseases, and suffer less maternal and infant deaths. The global record is blunt: When countries choose more privatization, they choose shorter, sicker lives.

Canada’s Health Act stands at a fork in the road. One path diverts resources to for‑profit clinics, normalizes extra fees and enables investor‑run facilities to put revenue over the public’s health.

The other path invests in health care workers, expands public operating rooms, funds team-based care and rewards family doctors offering comprehensive primary care.

The second path is worth defending, and it demands enforcing existing laws against extra-billing and consequences for clinics that break them.

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith said, “Health care shouldn’t be about blind and outdated ideologies or politics.”

Let’s hope she wasn’t referring to universal public health care. What happens in Alberta doesn’t stay in Alberta. Every dollar “invested” into for‑profit clinics drains the public system. When profits are prioritized over health, it results in more preventable illnesses and shorter lives.

Alberta sets a dangerous precedent for Ontario, tying timely care to a person’s bank balance and ignoring a fundamental truth: Privatization leaves the sickest and poorest behind, while those who can pay leapfrog to the front of the line.

Link to original article: https://www.thestar.com/opinion/contributors/alberta-is-turning-public-hospitals-into-private-businesses-will-ontario-follow/article_ab5e58c3-af4a-4879-a92f-d63c4a2bbded.html

(November 28, 2025)

By: Jason Setnyk, Seaway News

Privatization of hospital surgeries in England has been “catastrophic” and should warn Ontario, Prof. Allyson Pollock told reporters at the Cornwall Public Library on Friday.

Pollock, professor emerita at Newcastle University, joined Ontario Health Coalition executive director Natalie Mehra and OCHU-CUPE president Michael Hurley to release new research on two decades of privatized cataract, hip, and knee surgeries in England and Scotland. England, she said, used public funds to contract procedures to for-profit clinics, weakening public hospitals. “Our studies show that diverting money from public hospitals to private clinics has destabilized services and training and shifted staff away from public hospitals,” Pollock said. While wait times initially fell for patients able to access private clinics, she said inequalities grew as poorer and sicker patients waited longer for care in England, unlike in Scotland, which kept surgeries in the public system.

By 2024, 59 per cent of cataract surgeries and 60 per cent of hip and knee replacements in England were done in for-profit facilities. Five companies were estimated to have taken £90 million in a single year from publicly funded cataract operations.

The coalition says the research offers lessons for Ontario, where the government is expanding the use of private clinics for cataract, hip and knee surgeries and diagnostic tests. Between 2017 and 2022, about 19 per cent of cataract surgeries in Ontario were already performed in private clinics.

Pollock called for “a complete moratorium on all privatization of elective surgery” and for existing contracts to be reviewed and brought back into public hospitals. The Ontario Health Coalition also used the Cornwall news conference to highlight access to surgeries locally, including what it describes as unethical practices at a for-profit clinic in the city that offered “queue-jumping” and urged the province to reinvest in public hospitals instead of “cannibalizing” them.

Link to original article: https://www.cornwallseawaynews.com/local/advocates-urge-halt-to-surgery-privatization/

Canadians’ medical debt largely driven by dental bills, prescription medications Healthcare related expenses pushed almost 18% of Canadians into debt. The poll, covering Canada, the U.S. and Australia, found Canadians faced the second highest amount of healthcare-related debt after the U.S. In total, 17.5% of Canadians are in debt because of healthcare costs. Dental checkups and prescription medications were the most likely sources of healthcare debt.

What ongoing healthcare costs do people pay for? In Canada, dental check-ups was in number one followed by prescription medications, then “none of the above”, followed by gym memberships.

Links: https://nbhc.ca/health-in-the-news/canadians-medical-debt-largely-driven-dental-bills-prescription-medications

https://www.comparethemarket.com.au/health-insurance/features/how-much-do-we-value-our-health/

(November 3, 2025)

By: Joanna Frketich, The Hamilton Spectator (behind a paywall)

–> Natalie Mehra, executive director of the Ontario Health Coalition, is quoted within:

Three patients were included in internal reviews of tonsil surgery at McMaster Children’s Hospital, documents released during the freedom of information process show for the first time.

The reviews were triggered by the deaths of two children after tonsillectomy surgeries in May and June 2024.

The public has a right to know what happened to the third patient, said Natalie Mehra, executive director of the Ontario Health Coalition, which advocates to protect and improve the health-care system.

“It is shocking to me that the hospital does not feel that it should be accountable to the public,” Mehra said. “Why are there three patients in the internal review? There is a compelling public interest to know this, and one would think it would be in the hospital’s interest to be transparent and open, at the very least, to ensure that the public can have confidence in their services.”

“They have a lot to answer for here,” Mehra said. “These are literally life and death issues for the families who bring their children to the hospital.”

“The bottom line is that quality of care information is vital for the public to know,” Mehra said. “For people to have confidence in their local hospitals is critical. Hiding information does not instil confidence.”

In addition, Mehra emphasizes hospitals are public services, funded by taxpayers and accountable to their communities. She questions how many health dollars have been spent fighting to keep secret the reviews into tonsil surgery at McMaster.

“All of the money that they are spending is public money,” Mehra said. “That should go to improving patient care and not to hiding information from the public.”

Link to full, original paywalled article: https://www.thespec.com/news/hamilton-region/they-have-a-lot-to-answer-for-hhs-refuses-to-explain-third-patient-in-tonsil/article_a953949f-b3fb-55b9-bfae-6e421cfb4461.html

By: Ontario Today with Amanda Pfeffer

Ontario Health Coalition Executive Director Natalie Mehra and Dr. Danyaal Raza were on CBC Radio’s Ontario Today’s provincial open-line program to discuss the expansion of private health care and to answer the question "The cost of private health care: How much did you pay?"

Link to radio interview: https://www.cbc.ca/listen/live-radio/1-45-ontario-today/clip/16184063-how-much-paid-private-health-care