Gotta burn their homes down. Make em feel really vulnerable.

these apps should re-release as neighborhood watch apps, that way you can report masked men and kidnappers and not our precious vulnerable ice community

And other lies people tell themselves.

Vulnerable to what, “under no pretext?”

Big capital doing the fascist's work. As always.

When fascists exist, it means they aren't vulnerable enough. When they are sufficiently vulnerable, they don't exist and society flourishes.

Never really cared much for the ruby ecosystem. I tried learning it a long time ago, but then decided to switch to Python. It has a nice name, but it feels like one of those languages people learn to be different.

Since then, I've moved on to Rust and can't really see a reason to stick with ruby other than for legacy systems.

Also, why did this trend of repeating quotes in massive font sizes take off for articles? Thanks for the archive link, fuck whoever pays these morons.

Arko told me he objected to that decision because of DHH’s “horrifying, racist, misogynist, politics” and DHH’s “personal vendetta” against him.

Yeah, you'd have to pay me to work with someone like this.

I feel like Scala went in the same direction and I believe sbt failure is a huge part of it. They should have adapted maven from the beginning but instead developed this finicky tool which failed Scala. Java is thriving at the same time because maven is stable and bulletproof.

It's insane how important package management and ecosystem is for a language.

Anyone get any steam forking them yet?

Kinda makes me wonder whether such things as Ruby Gems can and should be distributed. Sounds like alternatives to Bundler are already in the works. I suppose supply chain attacks would be the weakness on a distributed model.

It's crazy how letting people say what they want on the internet is seen as controversial.

Just goes to show how conditioned the average idiot has been in order to make nobody can share rhetoric that threatens the status quo.

78%, not bad. Anything with no people or animals are always harder to spot, especially with how small the pictures are. I want to try one with with bigger pictures and people prominently featured.

20/20.

The nature shots were harder than shit that had man-made things or people in them. But also, the resolution of each pairing being dramatically different kinda gave a pattern to which one would be which.

It seems like a reply to the wrong point.

I'm not saying most people can tell the difference. If they can now, they won't soon. My issues with AI are about training on people's work and then killing their jobs. Also destroying the environment, and other issues.

The swipe to move to the next slide was so similar to the swipe backwards, I exited twice and gave up.

Yep that got me too. Those lily pads looked very unlikely

Nice try but I'm not doing QA checks for generative AI slop.

• Reality Check #1 18/20
• Perfect Streak: 13

I can spot AI images 90% of the time.

Here's the thing: you should expect some things that aren't average in reality. Sure, most ice won't do what you're looking at, but some will. The left image all looks the same across the image. There's nothing that is non-average looking.

Skill issue /s

fuck that UI. tapping to select and zoom below is odd. I messed up a few and exited.

Those images are very AI-easy IMO. No crowds or complex images.

I don't think much training can be done on 20 pictures

That's one of the problems with AI images, anything that looks weird is now dismissed as AI even if the photos are century old. A colleague of mine said crabeater seal teeth are definitely AI, for instance.

crabeater seal skull

🤖 Reality Check #1 19/20 🔥 Perfect Streak: 18

I can spot AI images 95% of the time. 🧠 Can you beat me? realitycheckk.com

The one pic with the pink flower and water bubbles under water really put me off