[–] 4 points 1 week ago

That's a remarkably well-written article.

I love that they contrast the guy getting arrested for putting up a sign, which is not illegal (did not even block the camera), and the passive acceptance of law-breaking by police using ALPR cameras.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    How long until these systems automatically ping law enforcement that a vehicle with statistically suspicious behavior is approaching...

    I don't think the constitution or courts are going to effectively protect people from these systems. Minority Report should have been a distant future to be avoided.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

    My town cut power to them and flock went in and reconnected it because they hadn't been explicitly told to fuck off.

    They know they're enough of a target that people are destroying them all the time.

    But that was on town property. I would think the college should be able to have flock employees trespassed if it was a constant thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago

    Maybe tell the students about where they are and how if they're destroyed the college won't go after then because they are not college property. Then they can take care of them this Halloween.

  • source
  • Fair point, though disobeying unjust laws is a civic duty —especially when corps are flat-out ignoring other, more fundamental laws leading to such ☝🏼 I suppose it's up to each individual what amounts to worthy expressions of their right to privacy and how far they're willing to go to defend it. ✊🏼

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: next ›