This project measures the human time required to deliver decent living standards through democratic economic planning. It reports weekly hours per 1,000 residents across core sectors (food, housing, utilities, care, mobility, industrial staples, culture, governance) under low/medium/high automation, then aggregates to total hours suggesting a ~10-hour social workweek at fixed quality and ecological ceilings

[–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

Vkeyboards/Screenboards already have alternatives. Physical keyboards, require funding.

No, you misunderstood me. I mean keyboard that when you type "a" it gives you "α" for example, and that for every letter.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)

    Really interesting, I support idea. But does it do the job ? Like reducing data being harvested ? And what about screenreaders, they can't parse it, and if they could that means it's pointless as scraper evasion

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    just make business accounts on mainstream social media. idk what your job is or if you can do it but in parallel you can also have business accounts on federated/private/ethical whatever you call it social media and with that you are also promoting other networks etc. if u have more people working with you use some federated chat xmpp for example instead of slack, stuff like that

    it's not your fault, there is no "ethical" production/consumption in capitalism

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    USERS are the problem.

    No they aren't, system(capitalism) is the problem. The llm work as intended, corpos can just market it anyway they want, hype people and collect money even with llm content is actually shitier, info you learn is shittier, everything is shittier. And of course point you seem to avoid but my guess is you will also blame it on the "users" is people loosing jobs due to llms, and actually people working more and payed less also due to llm.

    It’s laughable that people think LLMs are even a dent in “society.”

    It is, as i said people loosing jobs, loosing agency, learning shit info etc. Social networks afaik didn't have kind of impact, of course shitty info yes and also AI amplified that shitty info intake via algorithm to keep people glued to the screen.

    The uses are not the problem, capitalism is.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (7 children)

    You could say the same about social media and the entire internet. Would you choose to regulate that?

    Yes, fediverse is imo good(not great) model of regulation by the network(s) itself.

    I recall in the mid 90s a group of people on the street corner protesting AOL (America OnLine) and saying the internet should be stopped. They were right.

    The vague way you talk about AI makes be think that you don’t know much about it. what do you use AI for? Is it ChatGPT?

    I use it small ammount most for translation and generating names for projects all locally.

    The point is llms can steer you in harmful direction, there is much hype around it, the effects on labour, effects on human agency and knowledge etc. The power is in big tech not in some communities that use AI for their needs, but the big tech creating needs and solutions to fullfill them via advertisment, hyping it etc. That is the point of discussion not if I used it or not, or to compare it with knife or social media(that is better comparison but still) etc.

    Do you think llms are that much beneficial to society or not ? What effects you see from llms in society ?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (9 children)

    If you’re going to refuse entire categories of tools then we are down to comparing AI to AI, which is a pointless conversation and I want no part of it.

    The point is not to compare but analyze how AI affects us and the world around us, society. By saying "it's just a tool", or "knives can also be missuesd" you relativize discussion and that rethoric just contributes to defending openAI and other big techs and even helping them banalize the issue.

    From what i witnessed is that people lose agency, get and belive fake info, everything becoming slop, people loosing jobs getting replace by more workers that are less payed etc.

    EDIT: And no it's not the same as knife or razor or a gun, it will never be.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    What is AI? A dominant view describes it as the quest “to solve intelligence”—a solution supposedly to be found in the secret logic of the mind, such as in its complex neural networks. Matteo Pasquinelli argues, to the contrary, that the inner code of AI is shaped not by the imitation of biological intelligence, but the intelligence of labour and social relations. Here he is interviewed by Richard Hames, audio producer at Novara Media.

    There is a part where he critiques "vitalism in cybernetics"

    Apocalypse Express (store.steampowered.com)
     

    Apocalypse Express is an action management Roguelike in which the player conducts, upgrades and repairs different parts of the train through endless waves of enemies in a post-apocalyptic setting. Departing the darkness of their lifelong shelter, the player decides to embark on a journey through the wasteland looking to fulfill the dream of seeing the outside world with their own eyes, charting out a map around the few remaining memories of the past world.

    Apocalypse Express (store.steampowered.com)
     

    Apocalypse Express is an action management Roguelike in which the player conducts, upgrades and repairs different parts of the train through endless waves of enemies in a post-apocalyptic setting. Departing the darkness of their lifelong shelter, the player decides to embark on a journey through the wasteland looking to fulfill the dream of seeing the outside world with their own eyes, charting out a map around the few remaining memories of the past world.

    The Cat and the Coup (store.steampowered.com)
     

    In The Cat and the Coup, you play the cat of Dr. Mohammed Mossadegh, the first democratically elected Prime Minister of Iran. During the summer of 1953, the CIA engineered a coup to bring about his downfall.

    As a player, you coax Mossadegh back through significant events of his life by knocking objects off shelves, scattering his papers, and scratching him.

    The game, situated within the traditions of Persian miniature art form and cold war foreign policy, asks players to consider their connection to Iranian history. The Cat and the Coup is both about the relationship between the Western video game player and Mossadegh and, by extension, the United States and Iran. It lays a foundation for today’s critical question -- how do the people know when their democracy is threatened?

     

    This story is profoundly ironic: America rejected cybernetics but implemented the cybernetic vision, while the Soviet Union did just the opposite: it paid lip service to cybernetics and stalled practical cybernetic projects. The cybernetics scare both focused the attention of U.S. science administrators on human-machine interaction and made explicit cybernetic references ideologically suspect. As a result, Americans pursued a narrowly defined but viable technical project, while the Soviets aimed at a utopian grand reform. This teaches us something about the power of discourse: it resides not so much in overt declarations but in subtle metaphors that change our mode of thinking and ultimately reshape our world. ≈

    The Luddites (1988) (www.youtube.com)
     

    Thames Television drama-documentary about the West Riding Luddites, from 1988. Please note, although this documentary accords with many of the known facts, there are several instances of dramatic license being employed in this documentary. Particularly notable are the angry meeting between the manufacturers and croppers (which never took place), and the scene at the end where the priest tries to take confession from the condemned Luddites (a reworking of the legendary last words of the dying Luddite John Booth).

     

    When reading some of Stanislaw Lem’s stories as a young adult, I first stumbled across the word ‘cyberneticists’ - basically denoting a tech wizard in the eyes of my younger self. Ever since reading Andrew Pickering’s The Cybernetic Brain - Sketches for another Future I think that this early impression was basically justified. In many ways cybernetics is the less successful but actually more brilliant twin of the poster child discipline of artificial intelligence (AI). Here I will explore why cybernetics was in many ways superior to AI, why it can still teach us a few important insights about the mind, and why cybernetics is relevant to the question of whether intelligent machines are dangerous for their creators.

    view more: next ›