Whenever you see people exhorting the Great Man Theory of corporate leadership, the very next thing you'll learn is that this presumptive Great Man has been a sociopathic asshole forever, and everyone around him has had to build a entire fortress of psychological and social scaffolding to shield themselves and others from their relentless abuse and constant bullshit.And one thing you can say for sure about moneyed shitheads is that they know class solidarity.indiatoday.in/world/story/jens

[–] [S] 1 point 7 hours ago

@rskrg I mean, you clearly have no curiosity about this at all but if it helps you to understand the analogy, here's the wikipedia article about child labor in the diamond industry: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_la

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    "A long term thinker" who "never charts a plan" to get there and has "never really done" a strategic postmortem, you say.That's just a daydreamer. The term we have for that is "a daydreamer."Y'all we've gotta just tax these clowns.technologyreview.com/2026/11/1

    In tech, you can always sunset a feature or update some code. But in politics, there is no undo button for failures that change public perception. The tech elites’ decision to visibly align their businesses with a temporary movement has left them no credible way to pivot now that the climate has changed. As one Meta employee who has worked closely with Zuckerberg put it, “Mark is a long-term thinker, but he never charts a plan of how to get there. It’s spray and pray and see what happens.” As for whether employees expect the company to do a strategic postmortem? “Facebook has never really done that.”
     

    RE: hachyderm.io/@inthehands/11761My friend @oration is fond of pointing out something that an awful lot of people who own several very nice suits really do not like to hear: any postmortem incident analysis that does not trace cause back to one or more management decisions is incomplete.

    [–] [S] 1 point 21 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

    Getting back to this thread - I've edited some posts upstream to make my point a little more clear - but two things. One, the idea that contributing to free and open software should require so much as contact with, much less a subscription service to, a wildly unprofitable, unethical and proprietary software service is a noxious, irresponsible and nonsensical position. But two: god, kid wherever you are I hope you're doing amazingly well. I hope you made it. You deserved at least that.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

    In conclusion, saying that open source participation requires monthly fees to private companies that run stochastic code generators means you’ve forgotten why anyone is doing this at all. Fuck this whole idea and fuck Linus in particular for pushing it.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 day ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (10 children)

    There's nothing I can do for this person. But the enormity of it. They've cobbled up a machine out of nothing but trash and their own tenacity, and they want to help us build Firefox? There's lots of ways to do that, but building it, compiling it, that can't happen. Not on this machine. There's always been a financial barrier to participation in open source. Always. And we have to make it as low as we possibly can. But a wealth minimum bar, to contributing? That's vile. It's disgusting.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (11 children)

    And I'm sitting there, reading this on the screen of a five thousand dollar Macbook Pro in an office where the snacks are free, feeling humbled and deeply ashamed.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 day ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (12 children)

    This kid is getting error message that nobody has ever seen because they've got a machine nobody else has, set up like nobody else does that nobody would ever choose. And you might ask how, but the first question is why?And the answer is: this kid has nothing. And they've built their own computer out parts they've scavenged from the computers other people have put to the curb, got a Linux ISO and somehow made it work. There are no computers like this. And... they want to help us?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 day ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (13 children)

    So, they're running one of those weird dual-slot Pentium III boards with two physical CPUs. Running Linux - somehow - on a hard drive that's almost full, a userspace partition on NTFS and more, and the more I hear about this system the more confused I get.For the non nerds following this thread, this is like finding out somebody's daily driver is built out of the parts of a sports car, a semi and a train, and it's running on vegetable oil. You might ask why, but the first question is ... how?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 day ago (14 children)

    So, after going back and forth a bit with person, who it turns out is in their early teens, we asking about their hardware, what setup they've got that's doing this. Maybe this person's got some new system we've never seen, maybe they're running in some novel context we need to know about. Is this an edge case, or is this a leading-edge case? Outliers are always interesting. I've seen some Pretty Far Out There systems, I run a few myself, and this kid's system is Out There.

  • source
  •  

    RE: circumstances.run/@davidgerardI'd like to tell you a story about a contributor who came to us at Mozilla, in my first 2-3 years working there. I never met them, don't know their name, and I still think about them a few times a year. They came to us with questions, as they were struggling to build Firefox on their computer, and they were getting errors that nobody had ever seen. And I don't mean "errors that were unfamiliar to our engineers", I mean "we can't figure out how or why our build system would emit that string."

     

    RE: kolektiva.social/@Hex/11761342The line is that the master's tools will not dismantle the master's house, but I think it's underappreciated how much the thought patterns mandated by capital proscribe us from even seeing much less describing, exploring and embracing larger possibilities, and how binding the totality of our thoughts to basic arithmetic anchors us in a position of profound spiritual and ecological poverty. We deserve better than ethopsychologia that turn every facet of our existence into a glass cannon.

    view more: next ›