[–] [S] 7 points 1 week ago

Balloting for C++26 as a whole. WG21 ("the committee") has finished the technical work on C++26 in March this year, but it wasn't formally approved by ISO (that approval was supposed to be this ballot). So WG21 will now have to figure out how C++26 can be changed, so that it will be approved by ISO (National Bodies).

P-members are ISO participating members, and O-members are ISO observing members.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    Please share your feedback in this annual 10-minute survey to help inform C++ standardization and C++ tool vendors. This is the biggest opportunity we all have each year to make our voices heard and help improve our industry and community!

    A summary of the results, including aggregated highlights of common answers in the write-in responses, will be posted publicly here on isocpp.org and shared with the C++ standardization committee participants and C++ tool vendors to help inform C++ evolution and tooling.

    The survey closes in one week.

    Thank you for participating and helping to inform our committee and community.

     

    On Saturday, the ISO C++ committee completed technical work on C++26 in (partly) sunny London Croydon, UK. We resolved the remaining international comments on the C++26 draft, and are now producing the final document to be sent out for its international approval ballot (Draft International Standard, or DIS) and final editorial work, to be published in the near future by ISO.

    [–] 9 points 8 months ago

    Somewhat related - who came up with the idea of stuffing all that domain verification tokens directly into TXT records for the domain?

    Just querying the TXT record of a domain might give you an idea what products a company is using...

  • source
  • view more: next ›