[–] 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The best way to post from Mastodon to Lemmy is like this:


Test post from Mastodon to Lemmy <- 1st line: automatically turned into a title

@Fediverse <- 2nd line: mentioning the Lemmy community

Writing this from Mastodon as a Test. Hello! <- Everything below: the post body


Lemmy automatically turns the first line/paragraph of a Mastodon toot into the title.

  • source
  • There's using AI assistance for clean coding and following all the other guidelines of good software development otherwise.

    And there's giving Claude Code a simple prompt to generate a ready-to-run application and uploading the result to GitHub as-is because you want to be a coder, but you don't know jack shit about coding or software development or licenses.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Also, Threads has introduced extremely strict rules for servers that want to federate.

    Entire Fediverse server applications are incapable of following all these rules, either technologically or by concept.

    For example, IIRC, Threads demanded a full public timeline. Hubzilla, (streams) and Forte do have that feature in code. But it's intentionally turned off server-wide by default, and there's a very good reason for this and for just about no serious admins of public servers ever turning it on.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • Lemmy is all about groups. It doesn't have any way to connect to and interact with single users.

    Mastodon, on the contrary, is all about single users following single users. It has no support for groups whatsoever. Mastodon users can follow Lemmy communities, yes. They can reply to posts, but in a very Mastodon way (automatic mentions, they'll probably insert hashtags etc.). Seeing (almost) the entire conversation is the default on Lemmy and extremely tedious and anything but straight-forward on Mastodon. And starting a new thread in a Lemmy community from Mastodon is difficult, nobody knows how to do it right, and whoever tries it will clash with Lemmy's culture.

    Stuff like Friendica or Hubzilla is somewhat more general-purpose. It can do both. But I've yet to see a Lemmy user subscribe to a Friendica group or a Hubzilla forum (the opposite does work).

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    And he wants to market it as his own, original, scratch-made, "nothing even close to this has ever only even been attempted before" creation.

    And because almost nobody outside the Fediverse has ever heard about anything in the Fediverse, he'll succeed. To the point where people will laugh about Mastodon being a Haven Social rip-off because they've heard of Haven Social first and Mastodon later.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    These odds are still extremely slim. Even if there was one Pillowfort user who has heard of Wafrn, that one voice wouldn't be loud enough to reach the whole crowd in time before they all move to something that's nothing like Tumblr or Pillowfort (e.g. Mastodon, Bluesky). And I don't think that there are that many more people on Pillowfort who have heard of Wafrn. Especially considering how few people on Mastodon, much less Lemmy, have heard of it.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    Not likely enough, though.

    I've watched Mastodon and its users for years now. From my experience, for more than 50% of all Mastodon users, the Fediverse equals Mastodon. That doesn't mean that they don't count Lemmy as part of the Fediverse. It rather means that they've literally never even heard about Lemmy. They haven't heard of any Fediverse software other than Mastodon.

    There are lots of ATmosphere users who haven't even heard of Mastodon, much less the Fediverse.

    Another example: I'm an active user of a virtual world system named OpenSimulator. It's extremely similar to Second Life, also because it uses the same viewers. It's free-as-in-license as well as free-as-in-free-beer and free-as-in-most-grids-don't-even-have-in-world-payment. It's open-source. It's decentralised to the point where your avatar can teleport to other grids (= worlds = server instances). And yet, the vast majority of OpenSim users have never heard of Mastodon either, much less the Fediverse.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    This thread at least implies a basic definition of the Fediverse: Fediverse = ActivityPub.

    But there's more than "uses only ActivityPub and ActivityPub all the time" and "doesn't understand ActivityPub".

    For example, there is (streams). It can speak ActivityPub. But it is not based on ActivityPub. It's based on Nomad. It also speaks Zot6. And its ActivityPub support is optional, both server-wide and per channel, although it's on by default in both places.

    And then there's (streams)' big ancestor, Hubzilla. It, too, can speak ActivityPub. But it is not based on ActivityPub either. It is based on Zot6. It can speak a whole lot of protocols. ActivityPub support is established by an add-on named PubCrawl which, by default, is activated at server level, but deactivated on newly created channels.

    Do both count as parts of the Fediverse because they both have ActivityPub support in some way?

    Do both not count as parts of the Fediverse because neither of them is based on ActivityPub?

    Do both not count as parts of the Fediverse because ActivityPub is optional at server level? Or because it's optional at channel level?

    Does (streams) count as part of the Fediverse because new channels support ActivityPub by default, but does Hubzilla not count as part of the Fediverse because new channels don't support ActivityPub by default?

    Does (streams) count as part of the Fediverse because ActivityPub support is built into the core, and does Hubzilla not count as part of the Fediverse because ActivityPub support comes from an add-on? (Side-effect, by the way: (streams)' directory lists actors using ActivityPub, Zot6 and/or Nomad, but Hubzilla's directory only lists channels using Zot6 in some way.)

    Or would you draw the line around individual servers, i.e. Hubzilla hubs and (streams) servers do not count as part of the Fediverse if the admins have turned ActivityPub off server-wide?

    Or would you go as far as drawing the line around individual channels, i.e. your (streams) channel officially leaves the Fediverse when you turn ActivityPub off, or your Hubzilla channel won't be part of the Fediverse until you install PubCrawl?

    view more: next ›