At a shareholders meeting/end of year report/etc... Does matter as long as it goes public.
Because Microsoft presented numbers that chuds think sound good, so they will want to buy their shares, pushing the share price up. The people who own shares but know the numbers are fud will shut up because idiots are buying their shares at a premium. The people without shares who know better won't buy shares, which doesn't affect the price, and Microsoft just replies nothing to their questions.
Depending on the specific flavour of Android, afaik. Not generally.
Pahlavi himself iirc never ruled and criticised his father who did, so not sure how correctly he can be characterized as an "autocrat". He might well be genuine. But yes, it's obvious that there's foreign countries who'd much prefer him over the theocracy.
The share price might change, as that's largely based on feelings instead of facts. Sure they didn't sell as well, but they presented numbers that look better (even if they aren't) so line go up.
Well, only on the right screen sizes it is. Otherwise the 'classic' variant gets disabled.
As far as I could tell the Shah guy isn't actually intent on becoming a monarch (he was fairly critical of his dad) but wants to help Iran transition towards democracy. How he does that, no clue.
Still, apparently that guy is the dude most Iranians trust to take over. I say most, but it's still barely 30% iirc; Iranians are pretty disillusioned with their (potential) leaders at the moment.
As a shareholder, you are financially incentivised to not question narratives the company presents if they supposedly present the company in a good light.
Suppose you do ask, the narrative unravels and the share price tanks. Congrats, you've just lost a buttload of money. Why would you do that?
No, best option is to applaud loudly, tout it in the press and watch useful idiots buy your shares at inflated prices.
The people who do ask the questions are the people the company doesn't feel obliged to answer.
When the battery dies, the glasses continue to function as a traditional pair of single-vision specs, ensuring the wearer is never left in the dark or have safety compromised such as when driving or operating machinery.
In my head this works quite well as an animated short film.
He's authored 60 repos on Github and has forked another 95.
https://github.com/marcj?tab=repositories&q=&type=source&language=&sort=
He also founded companies and used to be CTO: https://www.linkedin.com/in/marc-j-schmidt-957875110
So I suppose he's both.
Some women visually prefer it for cultural reasons. This mostly goes for the US, in Europe it's different. But most threads I can find state women prefer uncut penises because they feel nicer and self-lubricate better.