all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [S] 9 points 4 months ago

This is a hilarious self own for the US. It basically shows the world how dangerous it is to rely on American tech since it can just be yank from under you. Imagine if you're making a US model as an integral part of your business and wake up to this. All this will do is to drive the rest of the world to use Chinese tech that's not subject to this kind of fuckery. And at least when you're using open models, even if the company shuts them down or changes terms in the way you don't like, you always have the option to self host. If you're relying on a proprietary model then you're shit out of luck.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago

    The day same day Elon is announced a trillionare, a competitor gets nerfed. 🤔

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    Policy as fight promotion, everybody.

  • source
  • 3 comments in c/AINews@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    we believe the government should have the ability to block unsafe deployments, as part of a statutory process that is transparent, fair, clear, and grounded in technical facts. This action does not adhere to those principles.

    oof

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 2 comments in c/usa@midwest.social view that post
    [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    I mean if it hurts an AI company that’s good in my book.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago*

    I don't like any of the AI companies, but the US government taking targeted actions against companies due to policy disagreements (in this case due to AI weaponization) is not a good thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • 1 comment in c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se view that post
    [–] 10 points 4 months ago

    Why? Are there Epstein files in there?

  • source