top 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 23 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I was able to totally remotely, over the air, upload a custom firmware to my speaker which I hadn’t paired with, which would reboot, flash the custom firmware, and after rebooting type in the command echo pwned and execute it.

So an attacker can hack someone else's speaker, turn it into a keyboard to the paired PC, and from there attack the paired PC.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child)

    IIRC long ago I read that this is a flaw/feature of the USB protocol itself.

    Maybe "Seller (..) doesn’t consider the behavior a vulnerability" ... ah wait, I'm gonna read the article now.

    Right, the real culprit isn't the USB connection but Creative's proprietary but totally unprotected transfer protocol that allows third parties to communicate with the device both ways, even load new firmware. No code signing there, either.

    I find both headline and first half of the article misleading; this is not restricted to a specific device. Possibly not even to one manufacturer.

    But at least it ends with

    It also raises the question: What other Bluetooth devices open users to the same attacks?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 5 months ago

    Right. The common one is an initially malicious device given to an unsuspecting user. This is a stock device that a user already has and trusts. It's a huge vulnerability that an unauthenticated user can completely take it over. This is a 9.3 CVE, without even considering pivoting to the PC.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    15 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 71 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    "Without being touched" seems unnecessary. That's one possible definition for computers: completing tasks that do not require manual intervention. Automation.

    BTW the real culprit here isn’t the USB connection but Creative’s proprietary but totally unprotected transfer protocol that allows third parties to communicate with the device both ways, even load new firmware. No code signing there, either.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I miss when Creative Labs meant you were buying a top notch sound card.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

    The player software than came with mine back in the good times was awesome. It had essentially a loopback recording feature where it'd record anything coming out the audio out. I actually ripped a few streamed songs that way by starting the stream and recording lol

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    It's just crazy how many Bluetooth devices have broken (or completely absent) authentication and pairing security.

    It's very difficult to tell when they're encrypted, too. Your Bluetooth keyboard and mouse could be broadcasting everything keystroke and click unencrypted to anyone within 100m or so.

    And that's just the accessories. There have been tons of exploits of phone and computer firmware over the years as well. Security is an afterthought at best with Bluetooth.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    $300 for a PC speaker? Madness.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 5 months ago* (1 child)

    These are probably garbage, but some people have money and understand that a good set of speakers is more important than the latest GPU for immersion 🤷‍♂️

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago

    A quality sound setup really is friggen nice when you don’t enjoy headphones while gaming, especially in racing games. For me, that’s way more important than the last couple of fps. And it doesn’t have to be expensive, I’ve found some old quality speakers that looked like shit but were mechanically sound and then went on the hunt for the best amplifier with the least amount of features I could afford. All in, it was under 1500dkk/$200.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Tittel is misleading as this a variant of BadUSB where a device act as keyboard device.

    And i agree and prefer that user is able to replace firmware.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)