Technology

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 41 points 5 months ago (1 child)

Yeah, my completely non-techie family members could become "hackers" easily that way.

parent

[–] db2@lemmy.world 41 points 5 months ago

parent

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 55 points 5 months ago (5 children)

LLMs are such a huge security liability, and noone seems to know how to properly secure them, probably because it is impossible. Yet very soon they will be incorporated in everything. Jensen Huang wants to sell you a box with an LLM controlling every single thing in your house.

hideshow 5 child comments

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago

Even a human support tech shouldn't have that much power. That should be a request to a completely different team that gets hard off of telling people "No".

parent

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It's not impossible. It's actually pretty simple. You just don't give it access to credentials or resources or sensitive information of any kind. Does that make them basically useless? Yep. But then you don't create massive security risks and legal liabilities with gross negligence either, so... gotta weigh those things against each other.

hideshow 2 child comments

parent

[–] naught@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago (1 child)

You can do this and still use it to generate insecure code or even malicious code! Humans suck at reviewing

parent

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 point 5 months ago

Unironically not a bad idea to have LLMs review eachothers code before committing. And then human review the PR.

parent

[–] one_old_coder@piefed.social 3 points 5 months ago

noone seems to know how to properly secure them, probably because it is impossible

Most likely because all the AI engineers are idiots without any coding experience to begin with.

parent

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago (1 child)

Why don’t these clowns go after the conservatives like Homan or Bovino?

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago

Because they went after a conservative like Obama

parent

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 child)

Why is there a fucking picture of Obama on the post?

[–] plant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 5 months ago

Did you read the title

parent

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Wouldn't have happened if he was on Pixelfed instead

[–] ModernRisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 5 months ago

So what’s the reason people are targeting Obama? I would have thought with the way things are going, people would target Trump mostly.

[–] homes@piefed.world 6 points 5 months ago* (2 children)

Well, the Obama White House has been a thing for 14 years…

But if you wanna post AI nudes of Obama, I definitely would love to see that. He may be 64, but he’s still a fucking smoke show.

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] pooterbroo@programming.dev 10 points 5 months ago (1 child)

I know you might be joking and it's funny, but I don't think we should make AI nudes of anyone even if they're attractive.

parent

[–] homes@piefed.world 10 points 5 months ago*

I am joking, and it is funny

But you can be right at the same time. Nobody should ever make AI nudes of anyone. That’s a fucking disgusting and horrifying violation of any and every person.