top 18 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 42 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    Oh no, not a better job market, more available housing, and less pollution! What a catastrophy!

    Flippancy aside, of course birth rates are declining. Of course constant expansion isn't sustainable. The systemic gluttony of capitalism literally cannot go on forever, and the faster we slow it down the better. It's a cancer on our species and our planet. If we want to continue to exist in any capacity we need to get it under control, and that's going to require reconsidering things like constant market growth and never letting the population fall.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    They are two ways for species to reduce their population. They way it happens for everything that cannot control their own birth rates (i.e. everything except us) it a catastrophic death rate increases via disease, predication or hunger. We control our birth rate to have get to a sustainable levels. Seems cruel to go the other way

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Good for them. Enjoy your life, save money without having to work more, and preserve your sanity.

    Kids are overrated.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    This article fails to address one of the main causes I see people list for not having kids. It's, "Is it okay for me to bring a kid into a world this fucked up?"

    A lot of young people are deeply certain that they're going to have to live through an ecological collapse and climate disasters. Why would they want to have a child, and be constantly faced with the fact that their kid is going to have a worse life than them. That their grandkids may not know what seasons were like?

    It's also so ridiculously expensive now. It's not worth it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    I'm 60, I asked myself this at 20 and answered no and had a vasectomy. Not just for any kids but for the biosphere itself, we in the developed world in particular, walk heavily upon this earth.

    The destruction is accelerating I guess and is more obvious now but it's been like this my entire procreating life, yiu just had to actually observe.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I always wanted children.

    I can’t afford one.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 5 points 1 year ago

    We planning on our first and I am unsure if we can afford one. Still trying anyhow and just going to struggle I guess.

    If we could frame the "population crisis" as this cost of living crisis and parental support this could be a change.

  • source
  • parent