all 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 38 points 6 months ago (1 child)

but this doesn't change anything... fines are just CoO, to large companies. they need to be forced to implement methods to allow consumer repair and maintenance, for all current and past models that are resistant to it, to fix this.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    They are being forced to allow customer repair and maintenance. The settlement requires them to provide outside access to a variety of tools and software, for the next 10 years. Still insufficient, but that's why it's being called a landmark deal. Nothing quite this has happened before, that I'm aware of.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    Great. Some of all those people they've tricked into paying several thousand dollars to much, will finally be able to get a tiny bit back...

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 6 months ago

    99 million is pocket change for them. Have a feeling they won’t change their ways until it’s really causing pain.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago

    A good start

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 6 months ago

    Board members of companies should be required a pay a percentage of all fines levied against a company. Otherwise its just an operating expense.

  • source