Farmers have been fighting John Deere for years over the right to repair their equipment, and this week, they finally reached a landmark settlement.

While the agricultural manufacturing giant pointed out in a statement that this is no admission of wrongdoing, it agreed to pay $99 million into a fund for farms and individuals who participated in a class action lawsuit. Specifically, that money is available to those involved who paid John Deere’s authorized dealers for large equipment repairs from January 2018. This means that plaintiffs will recover somewhere between 26% and 53% of overcharge damages, according to one of the court documents—far beyond the typical amount, which lands between 5% and 15%.

The settlement also includes an agreement by Deere to provide “the digital tools ​required for the maintenance, diagnosis, and repair” of tractors, combines, and other machinery for 10 years. That part is crucial, as farmers previously resorted to hacking their own equipment’s software just to get it up and running again. John Deere signed a memorandum of understanding in 2023 that partially addressed those concerns, providing third parties with the technology to diagnose and repair, as long as its intellectual property was safeguarded. Monday’s settlement seems to represent a much stronger (and legally binding) step forward.

all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 27 points 7 months ago

Its worth noting that this settlement is technically just kicking the can down the road 10 years and 99 mil is just a rounding error when it comes to corpos at this scale. In my opinion, the endgame of right to repair is robust legislation.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago

    Good to see a corpo lose, but this is hardly a hit to them. 99$ million is pocket change for John Deere, they had around 5$ billion dollars in net profit last year. That's not even 2% procent.

    If I took the avarage yearly salary in my country, minus taxes and cost of living expenses, and took 2% of that I probably couldn't even buy a book.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago*

    Good. John Deere represents the worst in right to repair. Phones and laptops are bad, but John Deere is the worst. A near monopoly contractors that coat well into the 6 digits, with locked down softwarethat is required, and limits on repairs and replacement parks that go and their printer cartridges drool over. Apple and its glued batteries are nothing compared to the required certified John Deere replacement parts.

    I'll gladly accept the 99mil, and also hope they get hit with more.

  • source
  • 8 comments in c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se view that post
    [–] 20 points 7 months ago

    We dont need a settlement, we need restitution and reform.

    Its time that when companies do systemic harm to their customers and the public, that the penalty should be transfer of ownership to a public NGO consisting of its customers and public representation.

    Something along the lines of chapter 9 institutions under South African law.

    To shareholders, make sure the company operates morally, or you lose your ownership.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 7 months ago

    Settlement is what percentage of annual profits? Oh, so the violation was worth it.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago

    Hardly a rounding error.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    The settlement also includes an agreement by Deere to provide “the digital tools ​required for the maintenance, diagnosis, and repair” of tractors, combines, and other machinery for 10 years.
    [...]
    Still, John Deere isn’t out of the woods yet. It still faces another lawsuit from the United States Federal Trade Commission, in which the government organization accuses Deere of harmfully locking down the repair process.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    LOL, that tractor with the extended front wheel base would steer like shit...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago*

    It's probably like that to reduce compaction by matching width with the cart. But it definitely looks weird, and they have ridiculously large tires on the front for some reason, so it's tilted back.

    And he should ship the graincart auger until he's unloading at the SuperB, that's how you break shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    There used to be a time when things were made to last. I still have a refrigerator that is older then my parents. It's perfectly repairable but consumes a bit of electricity but it's better then buying a new one every 5 years and throwing the old one in a dump.

  • source
  • 4 comments in c/usa@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 10 points 7 months ago

    Penalties should be a lot worse than they are, but the requirement to open up availability of tools for 10 years is nice. And the number of about 50% for repair costs being reimbursed is striking, compared to what these kinds of settlements usually pay out. Which, of course, is depressing, in itself.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    I'm tired of hearing about fines, it's clearly not enough. Start sending these people to prison.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    That's about 2% of John Deere's total profit in 2025.

  • source
  • 3 comments in c/usa@midwest.social view that post
    [–] 10 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    It's not that monumental, and still lower than the profits from their actions.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    I you bother to open the article and only just look under the header you will see also:

    "The ag manufacturing giant will also make digital diagnostic, maintenance, and repair tools available to third parties for 10 years."

    Which is a big deal for right to repair if you've followed this issue at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • See, that’s one of the big things that infuriates me about corporate penalties of this nature: the profit they generate from the illegal thing generally outweighs - and often outright dwarfs by orders of magnitude - the penalty the court assesses. The solution is super obvious: assess penalties on top of the confiscation of ill-gotten gains. But that will certainly never happen.

  • source
  • parent
  • 1 comment in c/righttorepair@midwest.social view that post
    [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    the $99million is pocket change to them. They've made billions with their grift. The "settlement" is just the cost of business. The only thing that matters here is the 10 year tools/parts to 3rd parties. And even that is pretty fucking weak.

  • source