all 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 4 points 8 months ago

Yeah and Boris charged taxpayers for all kinds of nefarious shit. I know we're using Andrew as the sole poster child / scapegoat for this whole thing, but can we please stick to the point....

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Massage... that's what I'm meant to get riled up about?

    We're talking about leaking national secrets and predatory sexual actions. BBC needs to get some perspective.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago*

    What were the rules when he did so? Was this mere arrogance and poor taste, or was it effectively stealing from the expenses account? BBC says

    there is nothing unlawful suggested in Andrew's behaviour

    So this is basically just stirring and click bait. The BBC used to be better than this.

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/drudgereport@ibbit.at view that post
    [–] 1 point 8 months ago*

    Andrew and his inbred circus clown of a family have charged the taxpayer for their entire existence, all of them without exception, from cradle to grave.

    And for Andrew, the final irony is that, now that he's been cast out of the inbred family, he's going to end up costing the taxpayer through HMP.

  • source