all 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 14 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

314m what a joke! Still, good to see them lose this court case

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Always nice to see a positive outcome, let's hope they lose the appeal.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    I hate that this is how our legal system has evolved. Trial courts mean nothing when a corporation loses, because invariably an appeal is filed, and if the circuit court upholds a ruling, well, time to talk to SCOTUS.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    You'd prefer to lose the right to appeal?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Not at all ... it's just that corporations, unwilling to take no for an answer, have functionally unlimited funds to throw toward several rounds of escalating court cases while defendants ... don't. It creates an inherently lopsided situation the legal system wasn't explicitly designed for, but now this is just standard.

    Companies walk into these trials essentially seeing the first round as a rehearsal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Doesn't the appellate court only accept the case if there's an issue with the ruling in a lower court? It's absolutely loaded, but it's hard to see an alternative without giving up the right to appeal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Not the ruling itself, but corporations file all sorts of motions before and during the initial trial specifically so that if a motion is denied, voila! Now the jury verdict and compensation decision isn't what they're challenging, but rather technical aspects from rulings by the judge overseeing the trial court ... admission or inadmission of evidence is always a popular one.

    To suggest that anyone else has the sort of law firms on retainer to play this game all the way to the top is folly. It's just another way in which the system is rigged.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Glad I'm running GrapheneOS. The only thing Google play services is allowed to do is validate apps and give me notifications.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    Does banking apps work on your cellphone?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Really just depends, one of my banking apps doesn't work, but another bank's app does work. When it comes to payment apps, I only use PayPal, which unfortunately doesn't work for me either. They have a long GitHub list keeping track of what apps have been reported to be working.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Not OP but I'm also running GrapheneOS. After some initial difficulty I had with one of my banking apps I got everything to work just fine.

    What does not work unfortunately is paying via google wallet or revolut.

  • source
  • parent
  • 4 comments in c/android@lemdro.id view that post
    [–] 15 points 1 year ago
    [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)