all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 13 points 1 year ago (1 child)

Not a good sign when one's first thought is, "wait, is this FDA approval or RFK's FDA approval?"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    That would have meant something a few years ago

  • source
  • 4 comments in c/positive_news@lemmy.ca view that post
    [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Going to a spate of “approvals” now science is no longer needed in the us.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Nothing fishy here 😉

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I wish I could see this as a positive

    If it were from another country, I might see it as positive but with Trump's FDA I will readily assume that this causes ball cancer in women and clitoral cancer in men.

  • source
  • [+] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)