all 10 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 5 points 11 months ago

So that's where Nick Merrill has gone!

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    So we are all going to sign up w/20500 as our zip code⸮Metadata is more important than having a name. GSM+CDMA are anti-privacy technologies.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Why not 90210?

    I remember reading something many years ago that non US people accessing things that require a US postcode will use that one more frequently then randomly selecting 5 digits.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    In hopes you read the spoiler, sure, I don't care. 20002 works just as well. Just don't expect privacy on an IMEI tracked business. Third parties will generate even more money tracking those new IMEIs on towers than if Nicholas Merrill gifts these SIMcards for free.
    It's a betting business, your purchase need not be necessary.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Inb4 this is shown to either be a honeypot or a datamining venture. 🫤

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago
    [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    I'm always questioning these so called 'privacy' cell providers. I've heard of multiple now, including this one. Cape, Helium Mobile, I forgot another one but again, it's really odd.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 132 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.ml view that post
    10 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    4 comments in c/technology@lemmy.zip view that post
    1 comment in c/calyxos@programming.dev view that post