Curiosity Stream’s owner has more content for AI companies than it does for subscribers.

all 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 28 points 11 months ago

The rule holds: never trust companies paying for YT sponsorships

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    I wonder if the creators are aware of this. I have been considering replacing youtube with something healthier like this or Nebula. I suppose Nebula it is.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago

    Ah dammit... Curiosity Stream was the only streaming service I'm still actually paying for. I dumped everything else for raising prices and enshittifying their services.

  • source
  • 4 comments in c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 32 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    God dammit. They're actually a great service. They make money. WHY IS THIS NECESSARY?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    they've been sketchy for a good while now. the combo deal with nebula ended because CS tried to stop their half of the revenue sharing agreement without telling the users.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago

    I got their combo a few years ago. I actually liked Nebula more than I liked Curiosity Stream. At one point the combo price was too expensive for me and I thought "why not subscribe Nebula only?"

    Good riddance in hindsight.

  • source
  • parent