Driving all the way from Washington state to DC to do this sounds weird as fuck as well. I don't believe this for a second.

I don't know about him, but I tend to believe it's on brand for the CIA's motives.

The CIA has destabilized democracies and taken power of many other countries on behalf of wealthy individuals, in the name of "promoting democracy." I guess it could possibly be America's chance at something like a redemption arc if we're not too dumb to recognize our own playbook.

If we are too dumb, then probably no need to think about it too much for now. There's always a plan in place, and they'll make sure you know when they need you. For example, for now they probably just need you to go along/agree with or recite something along the lines of:

"This is an outrage to every patriot and that guy clearly proves all immigrants hate America. This incident also proves why we need to normalize military on every American street. This country is a war zone over run with terrorists seeking to harm other Americans. This is also why Antifa has to be designated a terrorist organization, and why Americans need to understand losing their own civil liberties are the cost that they have to pay for the greater good. He who gives up liberty for safety... will eventually forget this was supposed to be a temporary thing."

Here's my theory: I think there's a lot of things the CIA has always done to influence public opinion in the U.S. and abroad, and they've never been above doing some fucked up and unethical things to manipulate the public.

I guess around the time of the patriot act, the president was given the power to pick who leads the CIA during their presidential term (which seems like an all around terrible fucking idea, and it's kind of crazy we don't talk about this more often).

So while you've always had the CIA doing the kind of stuff we're seeing them do currently in the U.S. and in Venezuela, for the last ~25 years, it was happening under leadership with fluctuating levels of competency reflective of the president. Maybe it's just because this guy looks so much like him, but I just keep thinking Trump seems to have placed Michael Scott in charge of directing the CIA.

It's definitely not that I think Trump is the first president/Ratcliffe is the first CIA director, willing to do some really unethical and harmful things to innocent people as part of a larger political strategy.

It's just that subtlety is not a strength of anyone working in this administration. You have the hubris and unchecked authority of the Trump administration working with the hubris and unchecked authority of the CIA, and there's nobody around to pump the brakes and suggest that maybe you tone it down a bit because you're being way too obvious.

Here is the other side of these shootings, the one that government doesn't tell you about.

Coming straight from the people like the recent one. If you watch the full video you can realise what pushes them to act like that.

https://youtu.be/DchO6ciuJCs

He was 15 when recruited in.