all 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 3 points 11 months ago

I'm glad this is picking up more steam.

Next up the triptych proposals: https://alexanderpetros.com/triptych/

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Why not just allow GETs to include a body though?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago

    Backwards compatibility, it's never been valid to send a body with a GET, and software does enforce that (to varying levels)

    It's easier to create a new verb with the wanted semantics, than to change an existing one.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    you can still send a body with a get, it's just up to the server to accept and parse it.

    I suppose you could use a proxy like nginx or apache and rewrite the body to params, but that's not really what GETs are for.

  • source
  • parent