1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 7 points 11 months ago
12 comments in c/publichealth@mander.xyz view that post
[–] 25 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Don't forget that they also buy from companies that use child slaves for profit.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Didn’t they also kill a ton of infants by aggressively pushing formula in developing countries?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago* (1 child)

    Was that nestle? I feel like that was some other formula company, and they also pushed it in the states and caused a shitload of malnutrition like everywhere for a bit.

    Edit: no it was nestle I’m wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    If there's any doubt about something absolutely inexcusably blatantly evil, it was either nestle, the zionists, or Reagan.

    Youll be right like 90% of the time.

    Edit: or kissenger. Brings it up to like 99 if youre not in the USSR.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 11 months ago

    They've done infinitely worse for babies than this.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Certainly wouldn't be the first time. Isn't it great that these companies get to kill people then just stay around and keep doing the same things over and over?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    Woah woah woah, those aren't companies those are people. Unless you're talking about crimes. Then those are companies but if they're going to get fined for their actions, then they might be Schrodinger's corporation.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Didn't we already go through this with them adding sugar to baby formula in Africa?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    This isn't even the first time an American company has purposely endangered African babies with dangerous or contaminated baby food. It's like they are pure evil.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 6 comments in c/globalnews@lemmy.zip view that post
    [–] 22 points 11 months ago

    Risking the health of babies for profit is kinda Nestlé's SOP.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 11 months ago*

    A company spokesperson said that having cereals sweet enough to be palatable to infants was vital in combating malnutrition.

    This is so evil. What are they putting in those foods in Africa that could make cerels not palatable? Sounds the like problem goes even beyond the added sugar, with very low quality ingredients.

    To me this is obvious. They can't sell the same products to the African markets at the same margin of profit so they bring the quality way down, and cut it with sugar.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    It's Nestlé, they would risk killing all life on earth for profit.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    These babies will have massive teeth issues too. A combination of really high sugar intake and no dentistry industry to speak of is a recipe for disaster.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago