1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 11 months ago

Interesting read, thanks. Can't imagine how this actually feels to play but it sounds fun. I love sci-fi but hate resource management stuff so I'd be wanting to play out individual actions more

  • source
  • 5 comments in c/rpg@ttrpg.network view that post
    [–] 4 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Good read, it's interesting how this differs from DND. Crazy cool how they are juggling 17 people, and DND falls apart with ~5.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    I don't get these low numbers. pathfinder's default assumes four but back in the day 6 was kinda the ideal party. If we did not have enough players sometimes someone would control two characters.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 11 months ago

    I have read stories that D&D in the 70s it was normal to have groups of 10-20 people. There were player roles like "mappers" for drawing the map. There was a "caller" who summarized the player moves for the GM.

  • source
  • parent