The article authors are equating an avatar speaking what family thinks the victim would say with the victim speaking for himself. That is not the same thing and the judge should not have allowed it.
post
replies:
5 comments in c/gai@sopuli.xyz view that post
AI avatar of the victim spoke of forgiveness. Family that created it asked for the maximum sentence, more than the prosecutors, and the judge delivered the maximum, saying he could hear the genuine forgiveness in the AI voice.
This sounds like some black mirror doublespeak.
Did he prepare the statement before he died?
replies:
permalink
fedilink
source
parent
hideshow 2 child comments
Article says his sister wrote the words, and she and her husband created the avatar.
all 3 comments