cross-posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/22401523

Settled legal precedent in the US is not “gospel” and in some instances may have been “something somebody dreamt up and others went along with”, the US supreme court justice Clarence Thomas has said.

Thomas – part of the conservative supermajority that has taken hold of the supreme court over Donald Trump’s two presidencies – delivered those comments Thursday at the Catholic University of America’s Columbus School of Law in Washington DC, ABC News and other outlets reported. His remarks preceded the nine-month term that the supreme court is scheduled to begin on 6 October.

“I don’t think that … any of these cases that have been decided are the gospel,” Thomas said during the rare public appearance, invoking a term which in a religious context is often used to refer to the word of God. “And I do give perspective to the precedent. But … the precedent should be respectful of our legal tradition, and our country and our laws, and be based on something – not just something somebody dreamt up and others went along with.”

Among the various cases Thomas and his colleagues are expected to weigh in on is a request to overturn the 2015 Obergefell supreme court decision that legalized marriage for same-sex couples nationwide. Other cases being mulled by the supreme court for its 2025-2026 term involve tariffs, trans rights, campaign finance law, religious rights and capital punishment.

Pretty sure everyone had this on their bingo cards.

all 10 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 26 points 1 year ago

Yes - we already know that you're entirely corrupt and possess zero integrity.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    So what he's saying is the court has already made a priori decisions, and are just going to spend their deliberation time coming up with justification.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    Something tells Harlan Crow will be gifting someone a brand new Winnebago soon!

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Technically, both judicial immunity, and 'impeachment is the only path to removal' are both only matters of precedence. Both should have been challenged under the Biden administration, forcing the opointment of a whole new court to rule on the matter.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    What is precedent if not legal tradition?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Oh wow no way.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago
    [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Corruption is back on the menu boys.

    It always was but there's just no need to hide it anymore.

  • source
  • 59 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
    25 comments in c/usnews@beehaw.org view that post
    17 comments in c/world view that post