▲ 4 ▼ She’s endured nine surgeries after a damaging procedure – now it may be offered again (www.stuff.co.nz) submitted 1 year ago by Sunshine@piefed.ca to c/newzealand@lemmy.nz 4 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago (3 children) To be fair one patient's complication from a too tight surgical device shouldn't ban a surgery for everyone permalink fedilink source hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] shellieg@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago Issues with surgical mesh are well known. Women who complained were often dismissed by their male doctors/surgeons. Further into the article it talks about 30 women per month calling into a registry that has been established. So it's not solely due to one woman's experience. permalink fedilink source parent [–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 point 1 year ago Yeah. Learn from the problem, do better surgeries (or whatever). permalink fedilink source parent [–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 1 point 1 year ago I generally agree. But it is almost impossible to make any judgement about the risk from the article. There is no information about the risk, are we talking about 1/100 or 1/10000 type risk. How much safer than the old procedure is it? What it the spread of complications like? Is this an all or nothing type or does it scale from minor to severe? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] shellieg@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago Issues with surgical mesh are well known. Women who complained were often dismissed by their male doctors/surgeons. Further into the article it talks about 30 women per month calling into a registry that has been established. So it's not solely due to one woman's experience. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 point 1 year ago Yeah. Learn from the problem, do better surgeries (or whatever). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 1 point 1 year ago I generally agree. But it is almost impossible to make any judgement about the risk from the article. There is no information about the risk, are we talking about 1/100 or 1/10000 type risk. How much safer than the old procedure is it? What it the spread of complications like? Is this an all or nothing type or does it scale from minor to severe? permalink fedilink source parent
all 4 comments