all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 8 points 5 days ago (1 child)

The US does 'defensive strikes' on Iran the same way I do defensive strikes on my fridge at 2am

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Defensive strikes carried out by the department of?...

  • source
  • 12 comments in c/worldnews@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 22 points 5 days ago

    Nothing more defensive than initiating attacks on a country on the other side of earth.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 5 days ago

    department of war now doing defensive actions in the middle east

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    Dropping bombs on Iran is just making them mad.

    If THAT is NOT the GOAL then I'd like to hear what the goal is.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 4 points 5 days ago

    A defensive skirmish with loosely related hostilities again?

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

    More reason to not vote R. Put it on the pile.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 5 days ago (3 children)

    Anyone in the US who vaguely gives a shit at all, please vote. If the machine changes your vote, correct it before you finalize it. It matters.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 24 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    By all means vote, but don’t expect it to put a dent in the US’ bipartisan imperialism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 5 days ago

    It's like they forget that the democrats, prior to the Iran war when it was clear it was about to begin, were basically talking in circles and letting it happen. Because they didn't want to be seen supporting Trump, but they just can't help but love them a good war. https://responsiblestatecraft.org/democrats-trump-war-iran/

    Two recent reports suggest that this lack of pushback could be intentional. A Tuesday story from journalist Aida Chavez’s substack Capital and Empire says top Democrats have worked to block consideration of legislation that would force members to go on record regarding potential military action against Iran.

    “The evidence, so far, is that leadership is trying to discourage that vote,” one activist and former congressional staffer familiar with dynamics on the Hill told RS. “And the primary people that serve[s] are the few dozen Democrats whose donors are hawks, but whose voters don’t want regime change war. That’s who the party is trying to protect from having to take a vote, because it's painful for those members to vote against their donors.”

    Drop Site News reported last week that some Democrats on the Hill might support pursuing a military intervention in Iran but, understanding a war would likely be politically catastrophic, would rather not go on the record and instead let Trump and the Republicans bear the responsibility and the costs.

  • source
  • parent