Lovin outside of a bed might be from a mod either vanilla expanded social interactions or romance expanded. Check if you have either of those installed.
post
I should have read the community name first..
You're not on !rimworldporn@rimworld.gallery , you're safe
Be glad it wasn't yet another war crime!
Can’t pawns do forbidden acts, just get a debuff?
If your religion forbids cheating, it’s a sin to hop in the wrong bed, and to get lovin’ with the wrong person.
Some of my colonists were engaged. One had free and accepted physical love, but the other had spouse only (strict). The game would not let me assign them to the same bed. If there is no way for them to have sex outside of sharing a double bed, then when will the mood debuff ever be applied?
Caveats and assumptions:
- I did not confirm that the wiki is accurate with the in game values for the various possible values for the precept.
- I only experimentally tried with spouse only (strict). It's possible the wiki is incorrect and the other forms of spouse only don't forbid bed sharing. I'm pretty sure the button to assign the abstinent pawn was simply gone. As soon as they were lovers I wanted them together to save a room. I think I would've clicked it even if there was a penalty.
- I only experimentally tried with the free and accepted precept pawn having the bed first. It's possible that maybe having the free love pawn move into the abstinent pawn's bed is allowed.
I get your point, sometimes you can tell them to do things they don't wanna do and just take the mood debuff. But that's entirely why I'm asking. Because I couldn't even move them into the same bed at all. So it's odd that there exists a mood debuff when it's literally impossible for them to do the deed.
Point 3 seems to be the next thing to investigate but they're already married now. Most of my pawns have free and accepted physical love, but I can try later tonight and see if a free and accepted pawn can move into an abstinent bed (even if an abstinent pawn can not move into another non-spouse's bed).
Why wouldn't he just get unassigned from the bed? Like when I break a wall in the prison every bed is now "for prisoners" and people get unassigned.
Seems like a better alternative would be something like allowing anyone to share any bed but have increasingly harsh mood debuffs depending on how negatively they view sharing beds. This would avoid the weird "I'll never share a bed unless I'm married! Unless of course, I was sharing a bed before I took up a new religion. That's different." The same way they don't get mood debuffs for "awful barracks" for being assigned to an awful barracks but for sleeping in one. Like "-30 Slept with non-spouse" (in addition to the "-X engaged in lovin' with non-spouse).
spouse only (strict) means they can only share a bed once they're married I believe.
all 14 comments