Got a new water kettle that has different temp selections for different teas. If you select a less than boiling temp, it’s smart enough to stop heating early, wait for the termometer to catch up, then give another burst of heat to reach the target. Fair enough.

OTOH, if you boil water, it does not bother to stop and read. Perhaps prioritizing speed over energy waste. When the water is bubbling like crazy, it’s clearly boiling at which point the thermometer shows 90°C. So it keeps heating to 100°C. Are thermostats generally that slow and far off? Or is my kettle’s thermometer particularly slow?

Low tech electric kettles which only boil the water have no thermometer AFAICT. Is it steam that triggers the off switch? Would that be faster than a thermometer that is 10° behind?

all 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 7 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

Normal kettles have a piece of bi-metal that chabges its shape and thereby triggers the switch once it's getting hot enough. This happens in my experience with a delay of around 10 seconds.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    Most now use a different method. The thermal cutoff has problems when the air pressure is lower than expected. It can get to a rolling boil, but never turn off.

    Most now use the presence of steam coming off the liquid. This means it gets to a boil, no matter what temperature that actually is. I've seen a demo where they put alcohol in, and it worked fine, despite boiling at only 78°C.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    I've personally resorted to using a thermal camera for green/white tea water temperature. I'm aware it's a little overkill however!

  • source