▲ 504 ▼ We hate AI because it's everything we hate (www.spacebar.news) submitted 1 year ago by corbin@infosec.pub to c/technology@lemmy.world 206 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago (4 children) No. No i don't. I trust alan Turing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] iopq@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (3 children) NB: Alan Turing famously invented ChatGPT permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago (2 children) One of the major contributors to early versions. Then they did the math and figured out it was a dead end. Yes. Also one of the other contributors (weizenbaum i think?) pointed out that not only was it stupid, it was dabgeroys and made people deranged fanatical devotees impervious to reason, who would discard their entire intellect and education to cult about this shit, in a madness no logic could breach. And that's just from eliza. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] iopq@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) We're talking about 80 years ago permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago* ~1948-52, yeah Edit: The underlying math and method. Not alone, of course. The main difference between then and now is the data set and some tuning, not a fundamentally new metjod or kibd of thing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] iopq@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (3 children) NB: Alan Turing famously invented ChatGPT permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago (2 children) One of the major contributors to early versions. Then they did the math and figured out it was a dead end. Yes. Also one of the other contributors (weizenbaum i think?) pointed out that not only was it stupid, it was dabgeroys and made people deranged fanatical devotees impervious to reason, who would discard their entire intellect and education to cult about this shit, in a madness no logic could breach. And that's just from eliza. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] iopq@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) We're talking about 80 years ago permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago* ~1948-52, yeah Edit: The underlying math and method. Not alone, of course. The main difference between then and now is the data set and some tuning, not a fundamentally new metjod or kibd of thing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago (2 children) One of the major contributors to early versions. Then they did the math and figured out it was a dead end. Yes. Also one of the other contributors (weizenbaum i think?) pointed out that not only was it stupid, it was dabgeroys and made people deranged fanatical devotees impervious to reason, who would discard their entire intellect and education to cult about this shit, in a madness no logic could breach. And that's just from eliza. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] iopq@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) We're talking about 80 years ago permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago* ~1948-52, yeah Edit: The underlying math and method. Not alone, of course. The main difference between then and now is the data set and some tuning, not a fundamentally new metjod or kibd of thing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] iopq@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) We're talking about 80 years ago permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago* ~1948-52, yeah Edit: The underlying math and method. Not alone, of course. The main difference between then and now is the data set and some tuning, not a fundamentally new metjod or kibd of thing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago* ~1948-52, yeah Edit: The underlying math and method. Not alone, of course. The main difference between then and now is the data set and some tuning, not a fundamentally new metjod or kibd of thing. permalink fedilink source parent