They are still bullish on LLM, just to augment rather than displace human suggested development.

This perspective is quite consistent with the need for a product that manages prompting/context for a human user and helps the human review and integrate the LLM supplied content in a reasonable way.

If LLM were as useful as some of the fanatics say, you'd just use a generic prompt and it would poop out the finished project. This is by the way the perspective of an executive I talked to not long ago, that he was going to be able to let go of all his "coders" and feed his "insight" directly into a prompt that will do it all for him instead. He is also easily influenced so articles like this can reshape him into a more tenable position, after which he'll pretend he never thought a generic prompt would be good enough