you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -4 points 1 year ago (9 children)
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (8 children)

    I guess I shouldnt expect you to be good at reading. Pity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] [S] 0 points 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    this is based on poore-nemecek 2018, a paper with dubious methodology

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] [S] -3 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    the LCA sources cited by poore-nemecek state explicitly that LCA studies should not be combined since they are disparately methodized. pootlre-nemecek combines them anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] -2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I still see no source provided that proves it wrong, or provides evidence of the contrary to the data presented.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    try reading poore-nemecek 2018's own citations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [+] -2 points 1 year ago* (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    I'm embarrassed for you.

    Seriously, reading skills worse than a 12 year old. You literally did misread, and Im not here to teach you how to complete a sentence before responding to it.

    Blowing up my inbox like an incel after a bad date, like I would ever continue a conversation with you. Go touch grass yourself, lmao.

    Guess what? You'll reply to this. Because you're a petulant fucking child

    Gonna block you now, byeee 🥂

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)