denies a purported genocide for which there is little to no direct evidence for outside of western government/media's unsupported claims, cites actual evidence - some of which I helpfully both linked and quoted - that against it, and doesn't even mention the US save to quote your original claim (for which you provided no evidence.)
FTFY. Funny how people see .ml and just stop reading. If you want to talk about genocide I'd love to discuss the US-supported one in Gaza that is actually going on right now and for which we have figurative mountains of evidence. No? You'd rather scurry back to your echo chamber than have your worldview challenged by someone who might have some idea what they're talking about? This is my surprised face.