At the upper end of that range, you are only getting 90% of their advertised bandwidth, even in ideal conditions. Is that actually an acceptable loss? Maybe they shouldn't advertise 125 mb/s if they can only deliver 90% of that in the best case.
Routers, network cards, and Ethernet cables being "gigabit" or similar is also confusing, but i see your point there.
I still don't see the harm in providing both formats, thought i do see the point in not switching to mb/s only.
In the example you posted, it would be 1000Mbit/s down, which translates to a real world speed of 110-112 mb/s .