Imagine taking the lightweight, privacy-focused appeal of Linux and completely ruining it by hardwiring AI models straight into the OS. Nobody is switching from Windows for more forced AI features.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

And it's super worrying, because everyone I know and almost every colleague I have is suckling on the LLM teets right now, but they don't realize that their enthusiasm affects the youth that we will have to rely on to maintain our projects once we retire. They're gonna be so bad at it.

Adopting and maintaining software is hard enough as a good programmer. 😅😅

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 hours ago (1 child)

    The current generation is throwing a massive slop grenade at the next. Here, catch!

    Technically, you can use an LLM to learn what code does, how a function works, why some convoluted workarounds are necessary, etc. If you really take the time to do that, you should also add lots of relevant comments to the code, something the LLM certainly won’t do. When you look at the code two weeks later, you’ll still be able to debug it on your own or tell an LLM to carry out very specific tasks for you. Either way, this route takes time and effort, which is why most won’t do it. The temptation to skip vital steps is too great. That’s how we’re currently driving to a software maintenance dead end.

    Sooner or later, the code is such a mess that you can’t fix it by throwing more AI at it. Humans have to understand exactly what the code does and why it works that way. When people start dealing with these slop grenades every month, they realise how important it is to have proper guidelines about using LLMs responsibly. It’s about time someone starts teaching these guidelines that haven’t been written yet

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment