So the funny text generator has finally came to my workplace, and I am indeed pressured to use it. But I do wonder, should I keep not using it, or should I tokenmax using random prompts?

Of course I won't use it to actually do work, Just sending tickets to it and never reading the response, just to appear busy. But I do wonder what's the opinion on nothing vs token maxxing?

For information, it's a claude team subscription. I do not want to advertise it, but it may be useful to know whether it is worth it or not

Edit: Alright then. Will not use it at all unless my company really force people to use it (like use it or get kicked out)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 2 points 17 hours ago (1 child)

But I love fixing the tech dept lol. It actually make me learn the different systems

CI is not applicable here (It's really a special type of development workflow I'd love to burn to the ground but coworkers can barely remember to commit on SVN...)

As for tickets, i wouldn't trust AI on any of it. Even with an MCP tailored to our app it keeps hallucinating (might be due to the lack of documentation). The only thing it's good at is code gen, which is 20% of tickets...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 hours ago

    The last item is really important to show the management. We vibecoded a ticket cataloguing script to show that infinite speedup in codegen will bring only x% speedup overall

    As for tech debt, it has 2 components: figuring out what to do, and actually doing it. I've often found that sometimes there's no time because the proper fix would need weeks of work. LLM have helped reduce that to a few days of work, including reviewing the PRs.

    If your colleagues are low tech, I really feel for you. This will make them feel really productive but essentially pile on shit

  • source
  • parent