you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 2 days ago (1 child)

I have an IBM oscilloscope from the mid/late 80s that uses 3.5” floppies for storage. They were already standardized at 1.44mb by 1986, and way more reliable ands robust than the bigger disks.

I know the big disks hung on in a few weird places (like the nuclear arsenal supposedly), but I bet ATC ended up with 3.5s as the ultimate magnetic media. As long as they were big enough, why change?

Also as a child of the 80s, I remember just how far the 5.25” vanished from stores when the 3.5 took over.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 22 hours ago

    Yeah, that's why I didn't speculate as to whether 5.25" or 3.5" was more likely, just that 8" would have been unlikely. We don't know how old the systems are, but I suspect you're right; the supply of 3.5" diskettes would have stuck around much longer, too.

  • source
  • parent