you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (23 children)

Geoffrey Hinton, who no one can say with a straight face "doesn't understand AI", also says they are conscious. But none of you screechers, yelling to the clouds from your grumble-goon caverns, wanna hear that.

  • source
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 days ago (7 children)

    I don't know him, so I can't speculate on his chatbot knowledge, but if we assume he does know how they work, I can definitively say he doesn't understand consciousness.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 3 days ago (6 children)

    His body of work speaks for itself. I can assume since you are attempting to stand against his knowledge with your own, that your understanding is equally as proven.

    Can you link me to some of your work?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago (5 children)

    First, do you genuinely believe LLMs are conscious?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 3 days ago (4 children)

    No more than I believe Broca's area and Wernicke's area are conscious, but neither exist in a vacuum devoid of the rest of the organism and surrounding universe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago (3 children)
  • [–] -2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

    I'm sorry I didn't realize that was confusing. A specialized chunk of the human mind used for language, removed from the rest of a human and the universe, does not reach a conscious threshold worthy of major consideration. Just like a severed finger. A bare LLM, removed from the rest of the the digital apparatus and the universe, does not reach a conscious threshold worthy of major consideration

    Now, I'll ask you one. Do you think there are conscious non-human animals? Or do you believe that is a trait only humans possess?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    Consciousness is having a subjective experience. Yes lots of animals are conscious.

    Wow, see how I answered concisely without typing a paragraph of fluff?

    removed from the rest of the digital apparatus and the universe

    Speak plainly, Ascian. Does that mean there are circumstances (in today's world) in which you would consider an LLM to have a subjective experience?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 2 days ago

    I've answered you twice. Once plainly. Once concisely. Can you not understand either answer? Your attitude makes you seem disingenuous. I understand that this is perhaps, frustration. Either way, I hope you have a good day.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (7 children)

    That's not a case of not understanding AI, that's just a case of having a misanthropic world view. His conception of consciousness is that there's nothing particularly special about it and that humans are just jumped-up apes that pretend to be important. He also probably hasn't actually spent much time philosophizing about consciousness.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago (6 children)

    Humans are just jumped-up apes that pretend to be important. Or are you trying to say we are magic?

    There is no "magic god juice" in humans that makes us conscious. Consciousness is a state already shared with non human animals.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

    And there you go, that's why AI boosters feel like they can say their toys are conscious. They don't think consciousness is interesting or different from how any other animal experiences the world, just jumped up apes that pretend to be special. Naturally, this leads them to conclude chatbots are conscious.

    It's gibberish, of course. In reality, they don't know what it is and don't care to define it because it is unimportant to them. These can be very smart people who know a lot about AI, but they don't know a lot about consciousness and their opinions shouldn't be taken that seriously. Qualia? What's that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

    I never said it was unimportant. You have jumped to a lot of unfounded conclusions.

    Do you believe that all animals are just unconscious reaction machines, except humans?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

    I don't believe a human and a non-human ape have equivalent ethical value. There's something different between them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    That's not what I asked. Every response you have given has been slippery and imprecise at best, and misleading at worst. I think you just don't want to say "magic god juice" because it rightfully sounds silly, but you really think "magic god juice" is what humans have.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 child)

    It's a question of phenomenology and subjectivity. This degradation of consciousness as "magic god juice" is just misanthropy. Yet, you yourself probably believe the life of a human is not equal to that of a non-human animal. Why? What's the difference? Can you even answer that? Have you even thought about it?

    There's nothing slippery about what I've said either. AI boosters think their toys are conscious because they see consciousness as unimportant and trivial. To the extent they've thought about it, they've decided their toys have equivalent value to human life and are willing to kill everyone to build the god machine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    It’s wild he says that they’re conscious when science & philosophy as a whole still don’t really understand consciousness.

    So it sounds like he’s an arrogant moron with a very specific expertise he likes to apply outside of where it should be applied.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment