you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Quick and dirty version. Governments create bonds, which is kind of like the opposite of a loan. It's a request for money, and in exchange they agree to pay what you give them back with interest. Then they shop around for people to throw money into the bond. That money is then used to pay for government services, equipment, facilities, etc. and taxes are collected to pay out the bond. It's a bit more complicated but like I said, quick and dirty version.

The general idea is you get a lot further asking people to float you a loan than you do hoarding gold or something to try to scrape together enough money to do big projects, and people aren't going to revolt or rob the treasury for a stack of unpaid loans.

Who does the state owe the debt to? Lots of people. Mostly rich Americans but also foreign investors, other governments, retirement funds, etc.

Does the US have a problem paying its bills? It didn't always, but in recent decades, yes.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (6 children)

    The US can always pay its bills because it can just print more money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (5 children)

    I mean, technically yes, but also, that's kind of a bait and switch scenario. You're honoring the debt, but what you received is worth less than implied, which means most people are going to think twice about buying bonds again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (4 children)

    U.S. bonds already pay more interest than Greek bonds. The dollar devalues every single day from the printing of more money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (3 children)

    You really don't understand how money works do you. If you want to get technical, private banks print more money than the fed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

    I understand that quite well. No reason to call me stupid asshole.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 days ago (1 child)

    The amount of money being printed has almost nothing to do with inflation (ie. the dollar losing value). As long as it's balanced and kept in tension by a relatively responsive interest rate, it doesn't really do much. Big, sudden floods of cash one way or the other make a lot of disruption (like QE after the recession, or COVID checks), but that's actually pretty rare.

    You made a silly comment that sounds more like someone who listens to corpo media than someone who understands economics. How am I supposed to know what you do or don't understand at that point?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Fedi is social media. Not an official repository of knowledge whereupon I have to provide only the most accurate of statements. Presuming I’m stupid because you don’t like a comment is not justified. If it was, then I could insult you for claiming that expanding the money supply doesn’t cause inflation. Or claiming the government has no role over the money supply. What do you think happens when the US lowers reserve limits for banks? That is rhetorical. Not an invitation for further discussion.

  • source
  • parent