you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 week ago (4 children)

She will now, she lost her 33 year non-parole period. Not that she was likely to make it out alive anyway, she doesn’t look like someone who would live into their 80’s

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 week ago (3 children)

    Yeah, the "likely" in the headline probably refers to the slim chance that she successfully appeals this decision to the High Court.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (2 children)

    You can see the prosecution’s plan. Give her a long non-parole period you know she is going to appeal then hit her with the removal of it so she is in for life.

    Suck shit you evil, arrogant bitch.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    I have heard unsubstantiated scuttlebutt that her community knew she was a bit funny.

    If only they had been able to get her the help she needed beforehand.

    The help society now needs is retribution and being made an example off.

    The problem is, being made an example of is not the deterrent normies think it is. The publicity and exposure is what some sociopaths thrive on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 week ago

    Worth remembering that her ex, the person many believe was the primary target of her murders, didn't come to lunch that day, despite her specifically urging that he be there. His comments seem to imply that he may already have been suspicious of her motives.

  • source
  • parent