204
AI disclosure is no longer required for the Linux Kernel (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 weeks ago by to c/linux@lemmy.ml
137 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=14c897740388216acd59477a382de327d5e27ba4

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Why is it that every single time you see someone trying to claim the role of ‘adult in the room’, they appear to be speaking from a perspective of being perfectly oblivious (albeit sometimes for the purpose of obfuscation)?

Did you miss the part where OP's entire argument was 'fuckstick'?

Yes, fuckstick. That’s the whole point to a lot of people. I swear, the level of smugness of AI true believers is totally inappropriate.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    In their defense, some people just are fucksticks.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    Sure, but if 'fuckstick' is your sole 'argument', you can't exactly call foul when someone declines to engage with you for being childish.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    Well, they were being truthful and children tend to be exceedingly honest. So yes, it was childish, in a way.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Children don't typically express honesty with 'fuckstick'. 'Childish' here is used to refer to the absence of capacity or ability to engage in constructive discussion. But feel free to keep painting 'fuckstick' in any shade you like. I personally prefer 'Yo mama' jokes when I lack the ability to win a particular argument.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (1 child)

    Sure, but calling people fuckstick isn't used on a large scale to shut down conversation, there is a qualitative difference here.

    Edit: I belatedly see your point that it could have been directly in response to that, in which case the pattern recognition was misfiring and I apologise.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] -2 points 2 weeks ago

    Sure, but calling people fuckstick isn’t used on a large scale to shut down conversation, there is a qualitative difference here.

    Maybe if 'fuckstick' was followed by a coherent argument. But instead of providing one, OP just continues to throw insults about their reasonable perspective somehow being 'smug' in some way. I'd call that childish too.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent